Working Safely In Health And Social Care Assignment Sample

Introduction Of Working Safely In Health And Social Care

Moving and handling context in this study

A 90-year-old woman, Mrs. Brown, mainly suffers from dementia. She is mainly used by the occupational therapist for defining the needs and holistic with a small size of full body sling for all transfers (Tinanoff et al., 2019). Apart from that, this context mainly shows that the sling has not been detailed in her moving and handling care plan, which was mainly treated in hoist by the transfer by the two people. Apart from that, several residencies are mainly required with a small sine of the sling, when the two peoples mainly shared their residents and did not allow them to return to the incorrect location.

Need a helping hand to polish your assignments? Look no further than New Assignment Help! Our dedicated team offers premium assignment writing services in the UK, tailored to meet your specific requirements. Explore our free assignment samples for inspiration and guidance.

Key steps of the risk assessment process

This is a systematic process through which the hazard is mainly evaluated in the workplace in this situation, the implementation of the control measure to remove this risk factor. In this case study, the main risk occurred when the old man faced dementia diseases (Wang et al., 2020 ). Apart from that, in this situation, Mrs. Brown is the sassiest of the two numbers of staff. When one staff member did not come on duty for three weeks, the other member mainly worked at a care home. Further, due to the hosting process, the sling tore, in part, then, Mrs Brown mainly affected striking in her head due to the base of the holiest.

Key legislation for employers and employees relating to the risk assessment

The Industrial Disputes Act of 1947, the industry, and the nature of the employees and employer relationship mainly impacted this legislation. Apart from that, the risk assessments mainly occurred when the hazard was mainly expanded by the towing staff. On the other hand, the several residents of the two staff, Mrs. Browns mainly committed to the medium size sling (Gallati, 2022 ). Apart from that, in this situation, Embry players mainly required the key safety of health to prevent accidents of ill health. Moreover, by major legislation which mainly addresses the rules and regulation of health safety, then MRs. Brown is mainly hurting due to the left from the bed.

Aim of the report

The main aim of this report, to identify the main risk passes the process of the given context and alos analyzed the main impacts of the employee and employer legislation modifying the risk assessment are in the case study.

Analysis

Step 1: Identify the hazard

The first step of the HSE risk assessment is to identify the hazard that is associated in the case (Rospa, 2023). In this case, it is understood that the slips and manual handling are the two types of major risks that have emerged within the care home within the case study. For completing the recognition of the risk, the home was explored to identify the faults that are resulting in the emergence of the risks. It was observed that the lack of adequate number of hoists have been a primary cause to the injury of Mrs Brown. Furthermore, it was witnessed that the lack of adequate staff population has been the reason behind the manual handling hazard. Therefore, the slips and manual handling have emerged as the hazard in the care home.

Step 2: “Deciding of who might be harmed and how”

The second step of HSE risk assessment is to identify the stakeholders who might be particularly vulnerable to the hazard. In an attempt to deliver on such identification, the extent to which the risks have an adverse impact is evaluated extensively. From the evaluation in this case study. It has been understood that the older patients in the care home are most vulnerable to the hazard of manual handling and slips since the manual handling injury mostly occurs when the staff is not able to support the load with the bodily injury and staff in the care home have been transporting the care home residents with bodily force. Furthermore, the staff are also susceptible to injury. However, it might be a secondary injury. However, the staff are more prone to the hazard of slips and trips as the hoists are not kept in organised manner and are loitered all around the care home. The staff are always in a haste and a slip in concentration could render them vulnerable in tripping over a hoist.

Step 3: “Evaluate the risks and decide on precautions”

The third step of HSE risk assessment revolves around the evaluation of the risks and selection of precautionary measures (Riskassessor, 2023). In this step, the current work processes are compared with the standard practices in the industry. In this case, the injury received by Mrs Brown was due to lack of small sized slings. The care home illustrates an ineffective approach when it comes to keeping a stock of the hoists as they were being shared around for multiple residents. Therefore, the control of inventory counting should be used as a precautionary measure to prevent accidents from manual handling injury. In this case, the lack of initiative of returning the hoists at the correct place has been causing the hazard of slips and trips. Therefore, the control measure is to keep storage holders at diverse locations within the home care premises.

Step 4: “Record your findings and implement them”

The fourth step in the process is to record the observations. It would involve the hazard, the types of injury and the implemented control measures. In this case, the observations has been recorded in the following table:

Step 5: “Review your risk assessment and update if necessary”

The final step is to review the risks. In this stage, the incident rates associated with the hazard are compared with the previous instances to identify if significant changes has been incurred within the care home.

Issue 1: Manual handling

One of the major practices of reducing the hazard of Manual handling is to assert the deployment of the adequate number of slings. This has a significant impact on the employers and the care home residents.

Care home residents:

The presence of an adequate number of slings would render the need of manually transporting the residents unnecessary. It is because meeting the demands of the older care home residents are of utmost importance and the absence of slings compels the staff to meet such demands without inadequate tools. This increases the chances of a situation where the staff are note able to support the weight of the residents and drops them to the floor, which leads to serious accidents for the care home residents. However, the presence of a proper quantity of slings would not compel the staff to pick the residents up manually and reduce the hazard from manual handling. Therefore, the practice of maintaining appropriate quantities of slings would have a positive impact on the care home residents.

Employers:

Suppose the employers have been found guilty for any injury to the stakeholder due to lack of adherence to the safety practices of manual handling. In that case, the employer will be held criminally liable under the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 as the employer might have to pay up penalties and serve a prison term of three years or more (Gov, 2023). However, the presence of preventive practices reduces the probability of such mishaps and protects the image of the employer in terms of workplace safety.

Issue 2: Slips and Trips

One of the critical practices of addressing the Slips and Trips hazard is the assimilation of the objects within the proper places. This practice has an extensive effect on the stakeholders of employers and employees.

Employee:

This practice ensures the fact that the hoists are not fallen around on the floor and the staff does not have to run in haste to procure hoists since it will be deployed in multiple places. This prevents them from tripping on the objects and sustaining life threatening injury such as paralysis. Therefore, it has a positive effect on the employee's safety at the care homes.

Employers:

The practice ensures that they honour the workplace safety and values the physical well being of the employees. Therefore, it is observed that the practice has a positive relation with the employer's perception.

Struggling with Healthcare Assignments? Let New Assignment Help guide you to success! We offer top-tier healthcare Assignment Help to ensure you excel in your studies. Don't let tight deadlines and complex theories hold you back. Get the expert support you need to achieve academic excellence. Contact New Assignment Help today!"

Conclusion

The report has been exemplary in implementing the “Health and Safety Executive's 5- step risk assessment process” for identifying the hazard in the care home. The findings indicate that the manual handling hazard has been responsible for causing the death of Mrs. Brown. The results also suggest that the Slips and Trips is a major hazard to the staff at the care home. It is analysed that the control practices for addressing the manual handling and slips and trips hazard are monitoring the inventory stocks of slings and placement of the storage holders for hoists at multiple locations within the care home respectively. The report has also analysed the impact of these practices in the perception of the care home residents, staff and employers.

Recommendation

Three recommendation

• Be clear about the limits of the risk - Taken responsibility in the risk asset areas and also allowed to identify the main risk of this study. Apart from that, business activities are mainly responsible when mainly identifying the risk management impacts on the workplace. Paper from the implantation of the warning indicators, the different risks can be measured. Apart from that, in this case study, Mrs Browns mainly faced their dementia disease which is mainly impacted to their whole body (Wideman, 2022 ). On the other hand, in this situation, Mrs Brown mainly faced their health issue. on the other hand, of the two staff, one staff mainly attempted to the first-day working, and the other staff also not been added to their duty for three weeks. On the other hand, taking responsibility for this risk assessment area mainly gives advantages for developing the risk assets signs of Mrs. Brown.
• Identify the risk assessment are in early on: The first fall mainly thinks about the main risk .on the other hand, Sandy alos think about how to minced this risk asset in a significant way. By developing the risk against the project critically analyzed the main risk of this project (Shad et al., 2019). Apart from that, in this case, study, Mrs. Brown mainly faced dementia diseases. The slings have not been given detailed information regarding their handling care plan which was mainly stated by the hoist for all the transfers plus two people. On the other hand, on occasion, Mrs. Brown was mainly assisted by the two staff. , the main hosts of the respondents are given a short period to transfer their beds to the commode without any hoist.
• Estimate and priorities of risk: Through the risk matrix, several risks can be calculated by both profitability which is and their impact on the workplace. Apart from that, in this case, study, it has been mainly examined that, the disease risk is mainly estimated when transferring Mrs. Brown to the commode, which mainly has a medium size of sling. In addition, one sling is mainly fitted further, and the other is resistant when it is competent for its morning task very quickly (Smith and Merritt, 2020). Further, the suspect prosecuted the main risk of this disease which has been estimated by the 2000 plus cost that falls to ensure the main safty of the under care. Apart from that, by the estimation of the main priorities of the risk, Mrs. Brown mainly impacts their dementia diseases. Further, The selling mainly provides detailed information regarding their handling care plan that was mainly stated by the hoist for all the transfers plus two staff. Where the one staff working with the care of the home and other staff have also not been added to their duty for three weeks. Apart from that, taking responsibility for this risk assessment area mainly provides some advantages for developing the risk assets diseases of Mrs. Brown.

References

• Gallati, R.R., 2022. Risk management and capital adequacy. McGraw-Hill.
• Gov. 2023. Manual handling at work - Musculoskeletal disorders - HSE. Available at: https://www.hse.gov.uk/msd/manual-handling/index.htm (Accessed: 21 July 2023).
• Gov. 2023. The Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1992/2793/contents/made (Accessed: 21 July 2023).
• Proactive risk management: Controlling uncertainty in product development. CRC Press.
• Riskassessor. 2023. The five steps to risk assessment explained. Available at: https://www.riskassessor.net/news/detail/five-steps-to-risk-assessment (Accessed: 21 July 2023).
• Rospa. 2023. HSE five steps to risk assessment. Available at: https://www.rospa.com/rospaweb/docs/campaigns-fundraising/hse-five-steps-to-risk-assessment.pdf (Accessed: 21 July 2023).
• Shad, M.K., Lai, F.W., Fatt, C.L., Klemeš, J.J. and Bokhari, A., 2019. Integrating sustainability reporting into enterprise risk management and its relationship with business performance: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, pp.415-425.
• Tinanoff, N., Baez, R.J., Diaz Guillory, C., Donly, K.J., Feldens, C.A., McGrath, C., Phantumvanit, P., Pitts, N.B., Seow, W.K., Sharkov, N. and Songpaisan, Y., 2019. Early childhood caries epidemiology, etiology, risk assessment, societal burden, management, education, and policy: Global perspective. International Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, 29(3), pp.238-248.
• Wang, C., Cheng, Z., Yue, X.G. and McAleer, M., 2020. Risk management of COVID-19 by universities in China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(2), p.36.
• Wideman, R.M., 2022. Project and program risk management a guide to managing project risks and opportunities. Project Management Institute, Inc.