UK Small Business Challenges & Solutions Case Study

Chapter 1: Introduction: Strategies to Support UK Small Businesses Growth

Topic: To investigate the challenges faced by small businesses in UK and how owners overcome barriers to entry competitive industries?

1.1 Background of the study

The competitive sectors that make up the UK's economic surroundings are ever-changing and small companies are essential to their success. Still, these firms are facing a variety of obstacles for establishing business successfully in highly competitive industries. Entry obstacles are majorly caused by variables like market saturation, rules obstacles and a lack of resources (McIntyre, 2021). It is essential to comprehend how entrepreneurs handle these difficulties in order to cultivate a robust entrepreneurial environment. Current report will shed light on the tactics used by owners to overcome obstacles related to market entry. Further, this study intends to investigate the particular difficulties encountered by small enterprises within the UK and offer insightful information to industry stakeholders, lawmakers, and would-be business owners.

1.2 Research Aims and Objectives

Aim

The aim of current study is to analyze the challenges faced by small businesses in UK along with the preventive strategies.

Objectives

• To ascertain the growth of small businesses in UK
• To evaluate different challenges facing by small business entrepreneurs in UK
• To identify ways strategies to overcome barriers to entry into competitive industries
• To recommend competitive strategies which help in dealing with challenges facing by UK entrepreneurs

1.3 Research Questions

• What is the growth of small businesses in UK?
• What challenges small businesses entrepreneurs are facing in UK?
• Which barriers to entry faced UK entrepreneurs are facing within competitive industries?

1.4 Rationale of the study

The UK economy is largely dependent on small enterprises, which play a significant role in creativity, job creation as well as economic expansion. However, when these businesses enter cutthroat markets, they face enormous obstacles. The requirement to fully understand the complex dynamics of these difficulties and more significantly to identify the tactics used by small businesses owners to get past obstacles to entry is what drives this study (Prasanna, et. al, 2019). This research holds importance as it can provide lawmakers, business stakeholders as well as entrepreneurs with specific information regarding the barriers preventing small businesses within UK from growing and remaining sustainable. It can make particular suggestions for modifying regulations and assistance programs after recognizing as well as assessing the difficulties which these businesses are facing. An invaluable guide for budding entrepreneurs looking to succeed in cutthroat industries is to examine the creative solutions and flexible tactics used by small business owners. The study's ultimate goal is to provide useful information that will improve the UK's entire economic climate and create an atmosphere which seems favorable for the growth of small businesses.

1.5 Significance of the study

This research is extremely important since it tackles the major problems that small enterprises within UK face and provides information about the obstacles that they must overcome to get into highly competitive markets. For lawmakers, companies, support groups and entrepreneurs to develop targeted approaches to promote small business development, they must have an in-depth knowledge of these obstacles (Belitski, et. al, 2022). The study produces useful knowledge that facilitates the creation of specialized support programs by recognizing efficient strategies used by owners to get past obstacles. In the final analysis, the results of the study have the potential to improve small company competitiveness as well as resilience, which will benefit the UK's thriving and diverse entrepreneurial scene as well as the larger economy.

Chapter 2: Literature Review

2.1 Growth of small businesses in UK

In accordance with the views of Brown (2020), analyzing the expansion of small enterprises in the UK is crucial to understanding the difficulties entailed in breaking into highly competitive sectors. Empirical data highlights the noteworthy contribution that small enterprises make to the nation's economy. Within UK, Small and midsize enterprises (SMEs) employed over 16.7 million people and made up 99.9%of all businesses, based on the Office for National Statistics (ONS, 2021). This statistical illustration emphasizes the sheer number of small enterprises and their effect on employment, highlighting their significance for the growth of the national economic.Nevertheless,Cowling et al, (2020) argued thata more critical analysisshows growth trends vary amongst industries. SMEs make a significant overall contribution, but there are differences that are sector-specific. As an example, the service industry has a greater proportion of smaller enterprises, which causes growth rates to differ from manufacturing or primary sectors. Because of this unequal distribution, industry-specific examines are required in order to precisely identify patterns of development and adjust measures.

According to the views of Akpan (2022) financing availability is still a major determinant of small business expansion. According to data from the British Business Bank (2022),£104 billion in outside funding was given to SMEs within the UK in 2020. Notwithstandingthis, there continue to be ongoing discrepancies in the availability of capital, with smaller businesses frequently encountering difficulties obtaining loans from conventional lenders. This emphasizes the necessity of implementing focused policies which tackle financial equality and small-company support systems.Masood (2020) stated that growth is greatly impacted by regulatory factors. According to data from the European Commission (2018), SMEs within the UK are unable to grow as a result of the excessive time as well as resources they devote to compliance. It therefore is essential to streamline laws and regulations in order to create an atmosphere that is favorable for the growth of small businesses.

2.2 different challenges facing by small business entrepreneurs in UK

Ahl (2021) identified in their study that SMEs now face enormous challenges due to declining revenues as well as rising operating costs. As a result of growing price increases and increasing expenses for raw materials, 41 percent of SMEs were forced to raise the cost of what they sell or provide in January 2023, based on information gathered by the ONS. Singh et al, (2019) examined that 70 percent of customers have cut back on discretionary spending as a consequence of the rising costs of living, which will cause retail sales to drop by 0.9 percent in March 2023. 89 percent of British adults are still impacted by the economic downturn, which has led company owners to think about paying more to their staff. Not every SMEs, though, are able to pay such rises, which puts them in danger of losing important employees to rivals who offer higher salaries.

On the contradictory note, Dabi? et al, (2021) defined that although expanding a company is a sign of achievement, it also comes with a set of difficulties, such as hiring more people, acquiring novel abilities, exploring untapped markets, setting up distribution networks, and handling logistics. These obstacles may result in unanticipated expenses, delays, and possibly unhappy clients. For SMEs, financing is still a major obstacle to maintaining and expanding their businesses. But the financing market is changing and providing options besides conventional banks. Zutshi et al, (2021) identified in their study that SMEs are less dependent on traditional financial institutions now that they have access to a wider range of options, such as government programs and angel investment.Complicated regulations pose yet another significant obstacle. Compared to their larger equivalents, small-scale companies within UK face disproportionate expenses from compliance. Entrepreneurs must spend time and money navigating complex rules and regulations, which takes attention away from their primary business operations. A careful analysis emphasizes the necessity of regulatory changes that strike a compromise between small companies' growth needs and compliance obligations.

2.3 Strategies to overcome barriers to entry into competitive industries

Volberda et al, (2021) assessed important tactics used by UK small companies to get past obstacles when they join cutthroat markets. A tactical device that small enterprises can use to stand out in highly competitive markets is differentiated products. Companies can attract and retain customers by providing distinctive features, superior quality, or distinctive branding. On the critical note, Jones (2021) said that maintaining differentiation calls for constant innovation and adaptability to shifting consumer tastes. Moreover, the efficacy of differentiation could be restricted in the absence of comprehensive marketing tactics.Contemporary company competitiveness is heavily reliant on digital change. Paletta et al, (2019) defined that small companies can expand their customer base and improve operational efficiency by implementing technology, such as online advertising and shopping channels. A critical perspective highlights that, in spite of its potential, digital change necessitates both financial investment as well as knowledge. Successfully managing this shift may present difficulties for smaller companies, especially those with fewer resources.

Kumar (2021) described that small businesses have the opportunity to combine resources, share threats, and access additional capabilities through collaborative strategies and alliances. While alliances can increase competitiveness, some argue that their achievement depends on things like mutual trust, shared objectives, and good interaction. Grafström (2021) stated that Problems arising from mismanaged collaborations can reduce their potential advantages.It is essential to deal with capital needs, and in order to obtain funding; entrepreneurs frequently use a variety of financial tactics. These covers looking for venture capital, loans, or crowdsourcing. On the contradictory note, Stentoft et al, (2021) defined that access to financing is still a problem, particularly for new companies or those without collateral. The state of the economy at the time might have an impact on how successful financial methods are.

Jaeger (2020) examined that having access to distribution avenues is essential for entering a market. Small companies can get around this obstacle by utilizing internet resources or forming alliances with seasoned distributors. However, Purkayastha (2020) argued that obtaining advantageous distribution contracts necessitates the use of negotiating skills and can be influenced by more powerful players within the market. Government regulations influence the regulatory landscape and have the power to help or hinder entry into the market. The usual strategies include advocating for beneficial laws and engaging legislators proactively. Nevertheless, recognize that policy shifts are frequently slow and that small companies may find it difficult to deal with changing regulatory environments.

Chapter 3: Research Methodology

3.1 Research Type

This study uses a qualitative research methodology, especially semi-structured interview, to explore the obstacles owners of small enterprises within the UK face and the tactics they use to get past entry-level positions in cutthroat industries. The variety and complexity of small-company encounters are the best captured by qualitative techniques, especially interviews. Because interviews are open-ended, participants are able to express their viewpoints, which yield rich, context-dependent knowledge about the difficulties encountered and the subtle tactics used. A balance between flexibility and rigidity is provided by the semi-structured interview form (Pandey, 2021). While enabling the investigation of singular experiences, it guarantees coherence in important themes. Due to the interactive nature of this approach, it is possible to delve deeper into participants' answers and uncover nuanced information that is vital to comprehend small enterprises operating in cutthroat markets. Detailed information for a thorough examination of participants' encounter and building rapport for open communication are two advantages of the qualitative, interview method. Disadvantages include the possibility of bias among participants in answers and procedures requiring a lot of resources. However, this approach fits the study question, providing a deeper comprehension of the tactics and obstacles faced by small businesses.

3.2 Research Approach

The exploratory character of the research is well-suited to the inductive approach, which facilitates the direct extraction of themes and knowledge from the information. This method allows for a comprehensive investigation of the various tactics used by owners as well as the complex problems that small enterprises confront because it takes a bottom–up approach (Mehrad, 2019). By enabling the identification of patterns and connections in the information, inductive analysis offers a comprehension of the intricacies present in a small company environment. By using this approach, the study seeks to make discoveries about unknown territory while letting emerging themes influence the conclusions. Understanding how small- and medium-sized enterprises navigate and conquer obstacles in competitive sectors within UK is made easier by an inductive method, which is crucial in capturing the variety and depth of encounters.

3.3 Research philosophy

In order to investigate the difficulties faced by small companies within the UK and the creative tactics used by their owners to get past entrance barriers in cutthroat markets, this study employs an interpretivism research philosophy. The research's objective of comprehending the individualized encounters and interpretations associated with obstacles and tactics in the setting of small businesses is in line with adopting the interpretive framework (Tamminen, 2020). Interpretivism places a strong emphasis on capturing the varied viewpoints of individuals in order to facilitate a comprehensive as well as contextually rich investigation, acknowledging the socially constructed basis of reality.Owners of small firms will be interviewed in-depth to acquire qualitative information. This method makes it easier to investigate how one's own interpretations, principles, and beliefs affect how one makes decisions when faced with obstacles and coming up with plans of action. Through the application of interpretivism, the study seeks to reveal the complex interactions between social, cultural, as well as context-related variables that influence small-company owners' encounters in the cutthroat UK markets.

3.4 Data collection

In order to thoroughly examine the difficulties faced by small enterprises in the UK. Also, the tactics used by their owners to get past entry barriers in cutthroat sectors, this research uses a mixture of methods, integrating both primary and secondary data collection techniques. Owners of small firms will be interviewed in-depth to acquire qualitative information. This method enables a nuanced investigation of the viewpoints, actual experiences and flexible tactics of business owners (Lobe, 2020). A deeper comprehension of the difficulties encountered as well as the specific to-context strategies used in navigating cutthroat industries is made possible by the comprehensive interviews. A detailed analysis of the current literature, reports, and pertinent documents will yield more information. Secondary information will give the qualitative data more contexts, allowing for an in-depth examination of the results and enhancing it with legal environments, historical viewpoints, and sector trends. For this purpose, books, journals and scholarly articles will be evaluated. This combination of methods design guarantees a thorough and reliable study by fusing a range of secondary information with the comprehensiveness of primary interviews, providing an in-depth analysis of the tactics and obstacles common to the UK small-company scene.

3.5 Sampling

The criteria for sample inclusion involve small businesses to make sure a substantial understanding of industry issues and tactics. To choose participants chosen specifically for their knowledge and experiences pertinent to the topic of the study, a purposive sampling is going to be used (Berndt, 2020). Referring this, 7 owners of small enterprises will be chosen based on their tenure, company size, as well as the diversity of industries. Using this approach, the researcher can get a variety of viewpoints and insights from business owners who have either accomplished their goals or are now navigating difficulties in competitive sectors. A Non-probability sampling technique called purposeful sampling enables a deliberate choice of participants according to predetermined traits or standards. This method improves the research's emphasis on the breadth and depth of data, making sure targeted research of the difficulties and solutions inside the UK small-company surroundings, even though it might restrict generalizability.

3.6 Data analysis

The present study employs thematic analysis as a research methodology to examine the obstacles faced by small enterprises in the United Kingdom and the tactics utilized by their proprietors to surmount entry barriers into highly competitive sectors. A qualitative technique called thematic evaluation makes it easier to find, examine, and understand patterns, or themes, in the information that has been gathered (Amalina, et al, 2019). It makes it possible to investigate company owners' encounters, difficulties and creative solutions in a methodical way, which guarantees a thorough comprehension of the study questions. The primary source for information will be in-depth interview conducted with 7 owners of small enterprises who were selected through purposive sampling. Rich qualitative information from these interviews will be produced, illuminating the subtleties and complexity of the difficulties faced and the variety of approaches taken by business owners.The study's rigor is increased by a thematic approach, which offers an organized but adaptable method for interpreting the information. The trustworthiness and reliability of study findings are increased by this procedure, which guarantees openness as well as traceability in the recognition and growth of themes.

3.7 Research limitations

There are a few drawbacks to the tactics used to get past obstacles to entry in highly competitive sectors. The amount of information collected and analyzed may vary depending on the funding accessible for this study. Budgetary restrictions may limit the scope of in-depth investigations, including lengthy trips for in-person interviews (Cooper, 2019). The research's depth and scope are limited by time limitations. Considering the parameters of the study's timeline, small companies' constantly shifting and changing difficulties might not be completely captured. The requirement for timely gathering and analyzing information may limit comprehensive exploration. The extent of the study may be impacted by the funding that is available. Budgetary constraints may place restrictions on thorough interviews, which could limit the amount of data that can be gathered. Notwithstanding these constraints, every attempt will be undertaken to optimize the accessible resources and offer a significant contribution to comprehending the obstacles and tactics faced by small enterprises in the United Kingdom.

3.8 Reliability and validity

To verify the truthfulness and veracity of the results, it is crucial to ensure the accuracy and legitimacy of this study. A strict approach to research and its design will be used to improve reliability. The research's validity is enhanced by the application of an organized sampling method and an organized thematic evaluation method (Fawns-Ritchie, 2020). The data will be even more reliable if inter-coder validity is routinely checked and the study procedure is clearly documented.There will be an attempt to gather current and reliable data in order to guarantee the accuracy of the study. Thematic analysis will be based on what participants encounter directly, offering a realistic representation of obstacles and solutions. The reliability of the research will be enhanced by the utilization of latest research and current sector reports, guaranteeing that the conclusions are applicable and accurate representations of the UK's small-company environment.For this study, the terms authenticity, uniformity, transparency, current information, and rigorous methodology are pertinent to reliability and accuracy. All of these factors work together to make research results reliable and strong.

3.9 Ethical considerations

The present study is dedicated to maintaining ethical practices during its investigation of the obstacles encountered by small companies in the United Kingdom and approaches to surmount them in order to gain entry into highly competitive sectors. Maintaining confidentiality is essential to safeguarding participants' identities and sensitive data. All information gathered, such as transcripts from interviews and any personally identifiable information, will be kept confidential and only those involved in the study will have access to it (Suri,2020). To ensure privacy, participants will be given identities when reporting. Participants will receive full details regarding the purpose, methods, and possible risks of the study before they decide to participate. Participants will be given the option to leave at any time without repercussions, and full consent will be gained. The study will properly cite prior research, providing authors' as well as sources' credit. In order to protect the protection of IP and prevent plagiarism, correct citation guidelines will be followed. It seeks to carry out an analysis that is open, considerate of respondent's rights, and compliant with the strictest ethical guidelines by taking such moral concerns into account.

Timeline

References

Books and Journals

• Ahl, H. and Marlow, S., 2021. Exploring the false promise of entrepreneurship through a postfeminist critique of the enterprise policy discourse in Sweden and the UK. Human Relations, 74(1), pp.41-68.
• Akpan, I.J., Udoh, E.A.P. and Adebisi, B., 2022. Small business awareness and adoption of state-of-the-art technologies in emerging and developing markets, and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 34(2), pp.123-140.
• Amalina, F., Hashem, I.A.T., Azizul, Z.H., Fong, A.T., Firdaus, A., Imran, M. and Anuar, N.B., 2019. Blending big data analytics: Review on challenges and a recent study. Ieee Access, 8, pp.3629-3645.
• Belitski, M., Guenther, C., Kritikos, A.S. and Thurik, R., 2022. Economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on entrepreneurship and small businesses. Small Business Economics, pp.1-17.
• Berndt, A.E., 2020. Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), pp.224-226.
• Brown, R., Rocha, A. and Cowling, M., 2020. <? covid19?> Financing entrepreneurship in times of crisis: exploring the impact of COVID-19 on the market for entrepreneurial finance in the United Kingdom. International Small Business Journal, 38(5), pp.380-390.
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L.V. and Valentine, J.C., 2019. Potentials and limitations of research synthesis. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, pp.517-525.
• Cowling, M., Brown, R. and Rocha, A., 2020. <? covid19?> Did you save some cash for a rainy COVID-19 day? The crisis and SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 38(7), pp.593-604.
• Dabi?, M., Stoj?i?, N., Simi?, M., Potocan, V., Slavkovi?, M. and Nedelko, Z., 2021. Intellectual agility and innovation in micro and small businesses: The mediating role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of Business Research, 123, pp.683-695.
• Fawns-Ritchie, C. and Deary, I.J., 2020. Reliability and validity of the UK Biobank cognitive tests. PloS one, 15(4), p.e0231627.
• Grafström, J. and Aasma, S., 2021. Breaking circular economy barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, p.126002.
• Jaeger, B. and Upadhyay, A., 2020. Understanding barriers to circular economy: cases from the manufacturing industry. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(4), pp.729-745.
• Jones, M.D., Hutcheson, S. and Camba, J.D., 2021. Past, present, and future barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 60, pp.936-948.
• Kumar, P., Singh, R.K. and Kumar, V., 2021. Managing supply chains for sustainable operations in the era of industry 4.0 and circular economy: Analysis of barriers. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 164, p.105215.
• Lobe, B., Morgan, D. and Hoffman, K.A., 2020. Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International journal of qualitative methods, 19, p.1609406920937875.
• Masood, T. and Sonntag, P., 2020. Industry 4.0: Adoption challenges and benefits for SMEs. Computers in Industry, 121, p.103261.
• McIntyre, P. and Thompson, P., 2021. Background to the Study: The Systems Approach to Creativity. In Paul McCartney and His Creative Practice: The Beatles and Beyond (pp. 1-44). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Mehrad, A. and Zangeneh, M.H.T., 2019. Comparison between qualitative and quantitative research approaches: Social sciences. International Journal For Research In Educational Studies, Iran, 5(7), pp.1-7.
• Paletta, A., Leal Filho, W., Balogun, A.L., Foschi, E. and Bonoli, A., 2019. Barriers and challenges to plastics valorisation in the context of a circular economy: Case studies from Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, p.118149.
• Pandey, P. and Pandey, M.M., 2021. Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center.
• Prasanna, R.P.I.R., Jayasundara, J.M.S.B., Naradda Gamage, S.K., Ekanayake, E.M.S., Rajapakshe, P.S.K. and Abeyrathne, G.A.K.N.J., 2019. Sustainability of SMEs in the competition: A systemic review on technological challenges and SME performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4), p.100.
• Purkayastha, A., Popli, M. and Gaur, A., 2020. Springboard internationalization by emerging market firms: Speed of first cross-border acquisition. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, pp.172-193.
• Singh, J., Sung, K., Cooper, T., West, K. and Mont, O., 2019. Challenges and opportunities for scaling up upcycling businesses–The case of textile and wood upcycling businesses in the UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 150, p.104439.
• Stentoft, J., Adsbøll Wickstrøm, K., Philipsen, K. and Haug, A., 2021. Drivers and barriers for Industry 4.0 readiness and practice: empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Production Planning & Control, 32(10), pp.811-828.
• Suri, H., 2020. Ethical considerations of conducting systematic reviews in educational research. Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application, pp.41-54.
• Tamminen, K.A. and Poucher, Z.A., 2020. Research philosophies. In The Routledge international encyclopedia of sport and exercise psychology (pp. 535-549). Routledge.
• Volberda, H.W., Khanagha, S., Baden-Fuller, C., Mihalache, O.R. and Birkinshaw, J., 2021. Strategizing in a digital world: Overcoming cognitive barriers, reconfiguring routines and introducing new organizational forms. Long Range Planning, 54(5), p.102110.
• Zutshi, A., Mendy, J., Sharma, G.D., Thomas, A. and Sarker, T., 2021. From challenges to creativity: Enhancing SMEs' resilience in the context of COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(12), p.6542.

Online

Get Extra 10% OFF on your WhatsApp order!

use my discount

• UK SMEs Statistics. 2023.[Online]. Available through: <https://leyton.com/uk/insights/articles/uk-sme-statistics/#:~:text=How%20many%20UK%20SMEs%20are,(50%20to%20249%20employees).>