Tort Law Presentation Assignment Sample

Introduction Of Tort Law Presentation

Tort law is defined as a major concept where the valuation of the wrong done to the individual or person provides effective relief from conducting wrongful acts by other associated people. The Tort law has adequately defined the value or compensation which is awarded concerning the monetary damages. The main aim of this presentation is to accumulate the required Tort law that is associated with the provided case scenario for "Serena and Vanda ''. The incident occurred with Serena in the weekly craft club which is attended by both of the 12-year-old girls. The valuation of the overall incident has reflected different scenarios by the different persons who are connected with each person.

The valuation of the overall incident has implicated the death of Maya, the mother of Serena on the way to take Serens to the hospital after an incident occurred in the craft club. Effect of the maya's death has created an impact on the mental condition of his son Freddie who has suffered from "Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)". The impact of this incident has also affected Vanda as she is afraid to attend any of the craft clubs after the incident. The valuation of these issues and the requirement to use adequate rules and regulations for getting claimed or sued by the person has needed to be implicated at the adequate range.

Accumulation of claim in negligence against Paulo for personal injury

The main cause of all the arising issues is analyzed for the incident in the craft club between "Serena and Vanda". It can be quite adequate to use statutes and claim negligence against Paulo for occurred personal injury. Serena can use the “Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948” and claim to Paulo for an incident in a defined range[1]. The use of this law can help in providing adequate claims from Paulo for “damages and personal injuries” that occurred due to this incident. The accumulation of the damages and assessment of the amount that occurred can be taken into account for an adequate claim.

The valuation of relevance to use the common case law and their required reference can be the effective way to claim. The case reference “JAC RICHARDS V SWANSEA NHS TRUST [2007] EWHC 487 (QB) 13/3/07” can be the implicated part that can help in claiming from Paulo[2]. It has been concluded that the accident has resulted in a major loss for Serena as she lost her mother on the way to the hospital and this is the major reason to claim. The use of the case reference as “JAC RICHARDS V SWANSEA NHS TRUST [2007] EWHC 487 (QB) 13/3/07” can make a major impact on getting a claim from Paulo.

Accuracy of claim by Freddie for suffering from Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) against Galore

It can be accurate if Freddie can claim for the suffered issue due to the car incident by the driver of Tables Galore. The required analysis of suffering from PTSD and use of the adequate law to sue local companies is needed to analyze the defined range. Freddie can use “Mental Capacity Act 2005” and claim for the issue[3]. Freddie's father and mother are no more and he is the only member in the family who also suffers from PTSD and not being able to make decisions.

The use of stated law and statute can be implied to gain effective claim value and make reflection on further living. The use of "R.T. v. LOUISE THOMSON '' as a case reference can be helpful in building the case and claiming the accurate amount in a defined way[4]. The use of the adequate case reference can be the defined range that can create a positive impact on the case against the Tables Galore. The issue faced by Freddie in that car incident has made reflection on the way to develop PTSD and create an impact on the required situation.

Claimed with the use of “Law Reform Act (Miscellaneous Provision) 1934”

“Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934” is mainly used as a defined act to properly amend required laws after the effect of death in required relation to the incident and adequate cause of action[5]. It has been adequately defined as "interest in civil proceedings" as incidents can need effective law reforms for effective decisions. The accumulation of caused actions against the different ranges as survives against and can be as per the case with the defined benefits in the particular estate. The accumulation of these aspects can make a defined impact at the time of achieving appropriate results at the end of the case.

The use of the "Law reform act (Miscellaneous Provision) 1934" in this case can be defined as a defined aspect that leads to a claim for appropriate compensation from each aspect. The implication of the "Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925" can be the other defined aspect that has led to state claims from damages at the defined range of adultery[6]. The implication of these ranges can help in making a proper claim against Maya's death in the car accident. It can be needed to take adequate References of the cases that are engaged or related to the "Law reform act (Miscellaneous Provision) 1934" and make a reflection on the stated condition.

The accident that Maya has caused on the road when the signal is red as she has adequately followed the rules but the driver of Table Galore has reflected her carelessness at the time of conducting work. The use of defined aspects has created a proper impact at the time of conducting work in an appropriate manner. The use of the "Law reform act (Miscellaneous Provision) 1934" can help in claiming against the occurred accident and make implications on the overall incident and damages in an appropriate manner.

Claimed for Maya's death

The successful claim with the use of the "Law reform act (Miscellaneous Provision) 1934" can be implied to state defined changes in the occured conditions in an appropriate way[7]. The main damages that are available as the required value of the car, and its overall income that can be the only mode to live a life of the Maya's two kids as their father was also no more. The use of the appropriate mode claimed by the family Maya has instigated to have an appropriate decision in an appropriate manner.

It is important for Serena and his brother to have a monthly income as both have no family to take care of them. The accomplishment of these aspects can lead to developing arguments based on the claimed value[8]. The use of appropriate cases as a reference and their required result with the representation of the situation can lead to having a proper claim after the death of Maya for Serena and his brother.

Use of Consumer Protection Act 1987 to claim against the store KraftyKrafts by Vanda

The use of the "Consumer Protection Act 1987" with adequate Safety regulations can be the major aspect that leads to ensuring consumers' safety in a defined manner[9]. The accumulation of consumer safety is adequately reflected with the effective use of the consumer protection act. The inclusion of Safety regulations in the Act 1987 has implicated state-defined changes in the overall conducted valuation in an appropriate manner. It has amended that the use of the "Consumer Safety (Amendment) Act 1986" can be implied to state provisions related to price.

The use of "The Consumer Protection Act 1987" can help in claiming to KraftyKrafty for giving ineffective and dangerous products. Vanda has used the glue from the craft set that is brought by KraftyKrafts that has burned his hand. It also ruined her new cloth (Top) at the time of using glue whose value is £40. It has been reflected as a major issue as the serious incident can create an impact on the safety of the child because of inappropriate products. It can make a reflection on a claim against KraftyKrafty for the serious incident.

Conclusion

It has concluded that Tort law has helped in conducting valuation on case scenarios in a defined range. The valuation of the case scenario related to the incident in the Craft Club and the injury of Serena is the primary issue. The required use of the “Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948” for personal injury can be implied to gain the required compensation. The use of a defined reason to claim against Table Galore can make an effect at the time of conducting an adequate valuation.

The use of adequate statute as the “Mental Capacity Act 2005” at the time of dealing with PTSD can be the only way that has implied over-gain compensation. The valuation of appropriate case reference at the defined situation as “JAC RICHARDS V SWANSEA NHS TRUST [2007] EWHC 487 (QB) 13/3/07" and "R.T. v. LOUISE THOMSON'' has helped in deeply understanding the situation. The proper claim on Maya's death due to the accident has been implicated to evaluate the respective position in an appropriate manner. The valuation of the required aspect to claim after the death of Maya from their two children has effectively evaluated and made a reflection on the stated condition in a defined range.

Reference

• (R.t. v. Louise Thomson) <https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=494b86a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7> accessed 19 July 2023
• ‘Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934' (Legislation.gov.uk) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/24-25/41/enacted> accessed 19 July 2023
• ‘National Assistance Act 1948' (Legislation.gov.uk) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/11-12/29/contents> accessed 19 July 2023
• Administrator, ‘Home' (Accident Claims Case Law UK & Personal Injury Lawyer Court Cases) <https://www.casecheck.co.uk/jac-richards-v-swansea-nhs-trust-2007-ewhc-487-qb-13-3-07.html> accessed 19 July 2023
• Briggs J and Scott R, ‘“Rape Myths” and a “Reasonable Belief” of Consent R v Lazarus [2017] NSWCCA 279' (2020) 27 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 750
• Loo PT, ‘Exploring Airline Companies' Engagement with Their Passengers through Social Network: An Investigation from Their Facebook Pages' (2020) 34 Tourism Management Perspectives 100657
• Participation E, ‘Consumer Protection Act 1987' (Legislation.gov.uk, 15 May 1987) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1987/43#:~:text=An%20Act%20to%20make%20provision,of%20the%20Health%20and%20Safety> accessed 19 July 2023
• Participation E, ‘Mental Capacity Act 2005' (Legislation.gov.uk) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents> accessed 19 July 2023
• [1] ‘National Assistance Act 1948' (Legislation.gov.uk) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/11-12/29/contents> accessed 19 July 2023
• [2] Administrator, ‘Home' (Accident Claims Case Law UK & Personal Injury Lawyer Court Cases) <https://www.casecheck.co.uk/jac-richards-v-swansea-nhs-trust-2007-ewhc-487-qb-13-3-07.html> accessed 19 July 2023
• [3] Participation E, ‘Mental Capacity Act 2005' (Legislation.gov.uk) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents> accessed 19 July 2023
• [4] (R.t. v. Louise Thomson) <https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=494b86a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7> accessed 19 July 2023
• [5] ‘Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934' (Legislation.gov.uk) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/24-25/41/enacted> accessed 19 July 2023
• [6] ‘Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934' (Legislation.gov.uk) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/24-25/41/enacted> accessed 19 July 2023
• [7] Loo PT, ‘Exploring Airline Companies' Engagement with Their Passengers through Social Network: An Investigation from Their Facebook Pages' (2020) 34 Tourism Management Perspectives 100657
• [8] Briggs J and Scott R, ‘“Rape Myths” and a “Reasonable Belief” of Consent R v Lazarus [2017] NSWCCA 279' (2020) 27 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 750
• [9] Participation E, ‘Consumer Protection Act 1987' (Legislation.gov.uk, 15 May 1987) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1987/43#:~:text=An%20Act%20to%20make%20provision,of%20the%20Health%20and%20Safety> accessed 19 July 2023