A Tesco Forecourt Of High-Power E/V Charging Plug Case Study Sample

Introduction To A Tesco Forecourt Of High-Power E/V Charging Plug Bays

Th? objective of th? project is to strategically connect Tesco forecourts with th? ?nvironm?ntal goals of th? UK government by designing and installing high-power ?l?ctric, vehicle (EV) charging outlet bays. Th? government has set goals to reduce gr??nhous? gas emissions by 57% blow 1990 levels by 2030, achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, and phase out internal combustion engine cars by 2030. This innovative initiative aims to b?st th? targets. Tesco aims to l?v?rag? th? changing market trends and consumer behaviors by adopting new technology like as fast-charging stations and r?n?wabl? ?n?rgy. This project not only demonstrates Tesco's dedication to sustainability, but it also makes a substantial contribution to lowering air pollution and lessening th? ?ff?cts of climate change.

Project Synopsis

Tesco's forecourts will now have high-power EV charging outlet bays installed as part of a strategic commitment to b?st th? UK government's ?nvironm?ntal goals. Th? initiative intends to establish Tesco as a pion??r in sustainable practices by capitalizing on th? growing use of innovative technology and r?n?wabl? ?n?rgy. Strategic communication planning, stak?hold?rs participation, and th? design and deployment of charging infrastructure ar? among th? key outputs (Adams and Blair, 2019). Stak?hold?rs encompass governmental ?ntiti?s, T?sco ?x?cutiv?s, cli?nt?l?, and technology associates. Technical specifications and regulatory compliance ar? ?xampl?s of constraints, whereas scalable and reasonably priced solutions ar? th? main emphasis of inclusions. Th? project is predicated on integrating state-of-th?-art technology and adhering to severe ?nvironm?ntal regulations, guarant??ing a favorable ?ff?ct on market share and value.

Objective of the project

Th? initiative aims to b?st th? aggressive ?nvironm?ntal standards set by th? UK government by designing and installing high-power ?l?ctric vehicle (EV) charging outlet bays in T?sco forecourts. By taking advantage of th? expanding market for ?l?ctric cars and r?n?wabl? ?n?rgy, T?sco hopes to establish itself as a pion??r in ?nvironm?ntally friendly operations and make a substantial effect in air pollution.

Analysis of cost-benefit

A significant long-term advantage is shown by th? project's cost-benefit analysis. Even whil? th? project's initial infrastructure and technological investment may be substantial, it complies with legal r?quir?m?nts, improves Tesco's brand image, draws in ?co-awar? consum?rs, and ?stablish?s th? firm as a leader in th? sector (Ahmadi, 2019). Th? long-term advantages ?xc??d th? initial ?xp?ns?s and include improved market share, consumer loyalty, and grater foot traffic.

Key project deliverables

The project has some key deliverables, which can be identified through the agile framework. These are as follows,

• Report on-site assessment
• Blueprint and design of infrastructure
• Installation of EV charging bay
• Compliance documentation
• Stakeholder report6
• Implementation of performance monitoring

Key stakeholders

• Internal stakeholders: Tesco BOD and management, TECO staff, stakeholders of the company
• External stakeholders: UK government, Environmental agencies, suppliers, customers and general users of EV

Inclusion and exclusion of the project

• Inclusion of the project: comprehensive training to Tesco staffs, continuous maintenance and monitoring of the program
• Exclusion: Changes to make the existing structure of the store, expansion of the forecourt of the store

Project constraints

The project constraints are the implicit and explicit part of any project. This project is also will be facing some constraints. All the constartnista re subjective to change and adoptive nature and it will occur as the project continues. The assumptions are made but they are not far away from the actual ones. The regulatory compliance with Government standards are on of the constraints. Limitation to the budgetary nature is one of the most important and timely approval of the design of the infrastructure is one of the constraints.

Assumptions

Th? high-power EV charging ?quipm?nt that complies with legal r?quir?m?nts becoming available. Th? incorporation of a resilient performance monitoring system to monitor ?n?rgy usage trends, system health, and ?n?rgy consumption.

Justifications for the project

The justification of the project can be indicated as its synergy with th? ?nvironm?ntal goals of th? UK government supports th? project's selection and ?stablish?s T?sco as a leader in sustainability within th? sector whil? also exhibiting corporate responsibility. An enormous market opportunity is pr?s?nt?d by th? growing demand for r?n?wabl? ?n?rgy and ?l?ctric vehicles (Amri and Latief, 2020). T?sco can gain a competitive edge, improve th? perception of its brand, and significantly lesson th? ?ff?cts of climate change by offering high-power EV charging infrastructure. Beyond being financially feasible, this project advances both social w?ll-being and Tesco's long-term sustainability aims.

Project Time Management

M??ting deadlines set by th? government and th? market requires careful planning and tim? management. For th? project to install high-power ?l?ctric vehicle (EV) charging outlet bays in T?sco forecourts to be completed successfully and to fulfill market and government deadlines, scheduling and tim? management ar? ?ss?ntial. Tasks including infrastructure design, ?x?cution, and site inspection ar? outlined in th? Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). Th? tim? estimate and activity lists specify th? d?p?nd?nci?s and length of each task. Quick action is necessary in light of th? rapidly advancing EV technology and shifting custom?r pr?f?r?nc?s. Missed market opportunities and a decline in comp?titiv?n?ss might arise from delays (Cakmakci, 2019). Th? critical path analysis and network diagram both highlight important tasks and guarant?? their timely completion. Using ?xp?rt project software, th? Gantt chart provides a thorough p?rsp?ctiv? for ?ffici?nt project management by graphically r?pr?s?nting work sch?dul?s. Th? integration of theoretical knowledge into project scheduling and tim? management guarant??s a methodical and structured approach, hence increasing th? project's chances of successful and timely completion. Additionally, this strategy fosters overall project r?sili?nc? by enabling flexibility in th? face of unanticipated obstacles.

Work Breakdown structure

In order to facilitate ?ff?ctiv? project management, th? project's Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) methodically divides activities into manageable compon?nts. Th? WBS moves on to a thorough site valuation and planning phase after establishing th? project scope, identifying important stak?hold?rs, and getting management approval (Gatti, 2023). Then, hiring design consultants, crating EV charging bay designs, acquiring high-power EV charging ?quipm?nt, and obtaining required licenses ar? th? different categories of infrastructure design and procurement operations. Activating th? construction crew, setting up infrastructure and charging bays, testing th? system, and securing safety certificates ar? all included in th? installation and testing phase (Hadwiansyah and Latief, 2022). A thorough and w?ll-organized approach to accomplishing project objectives is ?nsur?d by th? strategically planned installation of performance monitoring systems, stak?hold?rs communication, compliance documentation, and project closeout activities.

Time estimation and activity list

In order to combat climate change, th? planned initiative will install high-power ?l?ctric vehicle (EV) charging outlet bays in T?sco forecourts. Th? task list and tim? estimate off?r a thorough schedule for completing th? project b?tw??n January and March 2024. Project comm?nc?m?nt, site evaluation, infrastructure design, procurement, installation, compliance paperwork, stak?hold?rs communication, performance monitoring system setup, and project closeout ar? important tasks. Important actions include hiring design ?xp?rts, securing regulatory clearances, analyzing th? forecourt site, and carrying out a thorough stak?hold?rs ?ngag?m?nt plan (Jamnuch and Vatanawood, 2019). Important activities like infrastructure design and procurement ar? balanced in th? timeframe to guarant?? timely completion and adh?r?nc? to a thr??-month window. Th? thorough diss?ction considers d?p?nd?nci?s, demonstrating a w?ll-organized strategy that supports th? project's proper objectives (Lock, 2020). Project manag?s may ?ff?ctiv?ly monitor progress and assure th? successful development of th? EV charging infrastructure within th?-designated period by using this detailed tim? estimation and activity list.

Network diagram and critical path analysis

Th? project's operations, together with their relationships and sequencing, ar? graphically r?pr?s?nt?d in th? network diagram. It displays th? critical route, or th? order of int?rd?p?nd?nt tasks that ?stablish?s th? project's lowest feasible tim?. Important checkpoints along this ?ss?ntial journey include acquiring permissions, acquiring ?quipm?nt, installing, testing, and completing handover.

It is also possibl? to observe parallel activity streams. For instance, in th? early stages, site evaluation, infrastructure design, regulatory compliance paperwork, and communication plan creation can all be done ind?p?nd?ntly (Naufal et al., 2021). Through finish-start connections, th? int?rd?p?nd?nc? amongst these concurrent streams ar? likewise mapped. There ar? clear boundaries b?tw??n th? major phases, which include planning, comm?nc?m?nt, design, installation, monitoring system implementation, and project closeout. After overall, th? network diagram off?r a clear visual summary of th? project's structure, making it simpler to analyze th? key route and activity d?p?nd?nci?s. It is a helpful project management tool for tracking d?v?lopm?nts and identifying any bottlenecks.

The project indicated the moist critical task through the software. The critical tasks are defining the project, and identifying key stakeholders. Management approval, impact assessment, high power EV charging technology and safety certifications, integrate staff training and monitoring the technology.

Table 1: Critical path analysis

(Source: Self-created in MS EXCEL)

Th? above data is an example of a Critical Path Method (CPM) project schedule that lists tasks, deadlines, and d?p?nd?nci?s b?tw??n th?. Th? project's ?ss?ntial path and possibl? flexibility ar? indicated by th? Early Start (ES), Early Finish (EF), Lath Start (LS), Lath Finish (LF), and Float (F) numbers. Tasks ?ss?ntial to completing th? project by th? deadline ar? included in th? critical route, which is ?stablish?d by zero float. Notably, th? may be a delay risk in Internal Staff Training (6. 2) due to th? negative float. Tasks including site investigation, obtaining regulatory permits, and installing infrastructure ar? all w?ll-organized by th? timeline. It ?mphasiz?s how important it is to get permissions and test th? system (Nina, 2020). It is necessary to address th? negative float in staff training in order to avoid project delays overall. K??ping an eye on these factors guarant??s ?ffici?nt project management and on-tim? completion. Th? project's critical path is 1. 1 -> 1. 2 -> 1. 3 -> 2. 1 -> 2. 4 -> 3. 3 -> 4. 1 -> 4. 3 -> 6. 1 -> 7. 1 -> 8. 1. Th? critical route has a duration of 75 days, which is th? bare minimum n??d?d to finish th? project.

Gantt chart

Th? project described in th? data that was mad available is a compr?h?nsiv? effort that ?mphasiz?s a commitment to ?nvironm?ntal sustainability and mitigating climate change by adding high-power ?l?ctric vehicle (EV) charging outlet bays. Th? plan, which starts with an 8-day project initiation phase, outlines all of th? important tasks that must be completed in order for EV infrastructure to be impl?m?nt?d successfully and on schedule. Th? delineation of scope, identification of stak?hold?rs, and approval from management ar? fundamental measures that guarant?? congruence with strategic objectives.

Important activities such performing a ?nvironm?ntal impact assessment, infrastructure design planning, and a forecourt site study ar? part of th? next 24-day site assessment and planning phase (Pasaribu et al., 2019). This step includes ?nvironm?ntal and regulatory factors in addition to logistical issues. Engaging design ?xp?rts, crating EV charging bay plans, acquiring high-power EV charging ?quipm?nt, and obtaining required licenses ar? th? main goals of th? 30-day infrastructure design and procurement phase. This ?mphasiz?s how difficult it is to crate infrastructure and how important it is to plan w?ll and follow regulations.

During th? light-day installation and testing phase, th? construction crew is mobilized, infrastructure and charging bays ar? installed, system testing is done, and safety certificates ar? obtained. Th? significance of regulatory compliance is ?mphasiz?d by th? four days allotted to compliance paperwork, which includes crating and submitting regulatory compliance documents and making sure ?nvironm?ntal r?quir?m?nts ar? followed.

36 days ar? dedicated to stak?hold?rs communication, which includes crating communication strategies, training internal staff, and launching a ?xt?rnal awareness campaign to engage and inform key parties in a proactive manner (Portly and Portly, 2022). Th? 40-day performance monitoring system implementation phase ?mphasiz?s th? value of monitoring and evaluation in guarant??ing project success by integrating technology, conducting training, and setting up reporting procedures. Project success, and final paperwork handover ar? all part of th? five-day project closeout phase (Rush and Connolly, 2020). Th? integration of monitoring technologies and stak?hold?rs communication ar? among th? noteworthy actions on th? critical route, which highlights their crucial significance in accomplishing project goals within th? ambitious 65-day timetable. This data-driven study demonstrates a w?ll-organized project plan that takes into account several aspects, such as stak?hold?rs participation and ?nvironm?ntal impact, all of which contribute to th? main objective of mitigating th? cons?qu?nc?s of climate change

Project Finance and cost management

Effective project financing and cost management ar? ?ss?ntial for th? successful installation of high-power ?l?ctric vehicle charging plug bays. By using project finance, financial resources may be allocated and tracked ?ff?ctiv?ly, guarant??ing accountability and transparency. Tasks like cost breakdown, which includes compr?h?nsiv? ?stimat?s for site evaluation, infrastructure design, procurement, installation, and compliance, ar? carried out in this project (Soothing et al., 2019). It is used th? project finance theory as a guide to d?v?loping a thorough cost management strategy that took probable risks and contingencies into account. By using financial ideas, it was possibl? to reduce financial risks related to regulatory compliance and stak?hold?rs communication, maximize budget usage, and make sure that money was allocated to important activities. Successful cost control improves overall project management and helps th? project make money.

Get Extra 10% OFF on your WhatsApp order!

use my discount

Th? project is overall anticipated cost is £39, 300, which is just less than th? £40, 000 budget that is available. Th? majority of th? ?xp?ns?s ar? made up of direct charges, which total £33, 000. Th? main line items ar? labor, materials, and ?quipm?nt. Across all project phases, indirect ?xp?ns?s ar? consistently calculated at £287 each job, for a total of £2, 300, or around 5. Nine% of total ?xp?nditur?s. This takes car? of necessary overheads like utilities and office space. At 10% of th? original TPC, th? £4, 000 contingency provision off?r an r?sp?ctabl? safety not against unfor?s??n circumstances and scope modifications (Teresa et al., 2019). Th? cost breakdown presents a methodical approach whereby direct project work is adequately resourced, indirect costs ar? comfortably covered without going overboard, and contingencies and overall budget usage appear sufficient. K??ping an eye on actuals compared to this bassline as ?x?cution moves forward will enable prompt detection of any cost overruns or areas that require attention. Th? secret to reducing budget risks is to k??p enough backup plans.

Th? updated contingency figure puts th? project is overall cost at £39, 300. Th? updated contingency provision helps to explain th? slight increase in th? project budget overall, ?v?n whil? direct and indirect ?xp?ns?s stay at £33, 000 and £2, 300, respectively. Th? revised contingency provision of £4, 650, which r?pr?s?nts 10% of th? initial project cost of £40, 000, appears more acceptable for a construction project of this magnitude. When contingency is calculated as a percentage of TPC instead of th? prior flat sum of £4, 000, it is directly linked to th? complexity and scale of th? project. This will provide enough l??way for unanticipated setbacks, variance analysis adjustments, and extra safety n??ds to be aspects that might be challenging to precisely identify up front (Tinsley, 2022). A sufficient ?m?rg?ncy fund that follows th? d?v?lopm?nt of th? project is ?ss?ntial for reducing budgetary risks. Th? updated computation technique takes into account better project cost planning procedures (Venkataraman and Pinto, 2023). Project success chances appear more promising with a little more effort against uncertainty, all whil? maintaining th? intended r?sults within authorized budgetary restrictions.

Project risk and stakeholder management

Risk Management

This risk register, which includes risks in several areas such as ?xt?rnal, performance, compliance, etc., illustrat?s an organiz?d approach to risk management. Identification is derived from a variety of sources, as ?vid?nc?d by risks such as ?quipm?nt failures, delays brought on by assessments, and variations in cost resulting from changes in supply and demand. Higher scores indicate major hazards in th? likelihood and impact matrix, which is scored on a 4x4 scale. This makes it possibl? to d?t?rmin? priority; for example, high probability/impact responses to R1 and R5 will be r?c?iv?d first. Planning includes assigning owners and actions to each risk as w?ll as appropriate tactics such as minimize, transfer, and avoid among others. Assessing risk treatments is aided by continuous monitoring of status and r?sults. For instance, moving R2 has b??n successful b?caus? th? vendor has b??n handed responsibility, but given that R4 and R5 ar? still operational, ongoing monitoring is required. Th? project would have probably had significant delays, cost overruns, and performance problems without this risk management. Instead, th? project is moving forward smoothly within tim? and resource limits thanks to early detection and mitigation efforts.

In general, th? d?v?lopm?nt of targeted mitigation plans, monitoring of risk status from a shard register, evaluation of probability and ?ff?ct, and organized identification ar? ?ss?ntial processes that show thorough project risk management (Zhang et al., 2020). This project demonstrates how risk management concepts ar? used by taking a methodical approach to risk identification, assessment, and reaction planning. Th? project team has shown initiative in handling opportunities and threats, and th? risk register functions as a single repository for recording and monitoring risks. This thorough risk management procedure strengthens th? project's r?sili?nc? and increases th? possibility that its goals will be met.

Stakeholder management

Identification of stakeholders using power interest matrix

As th? owner and primary benefactor of th? forecourt, T?sco possesses significant authority and interest. Due to their little influence but great utilization, EV driver's ar? very int?r?st?d in projects. Although th? show little enthusiasm, th? construction crew and design consultants have a big influence on th? project's budget and timeline. Regulatory bodies have great control over legal compliance but little interest in it. Lastly, whil? th? have less decision-making power, th? internal project tam, which consists of th? manag?s, office, and programmers, is greatly int?r?st?d in th? project's successful completion. For a project to be viable and ?x?cut?d, it is ?ss?ntial to manag?s ?xp?ctations and ?ngag?m?nt for these defined groups with different interests and levels of power in a ?ff?ctiv? manner.

Stakeholder communication plan

Stak?hold?rs communication that is ?ff?ctiv? is ?ss?ntial to th? project's success. For very stak?hold?rs group, th? communication strategy specifies th? goals, approaches, frequency, and owners. Involvement and alignment with T?sco, EV drivers, design consultants, th? building tam, regulatory authorities, and th? project tam ar? ?nsur?d through regular updates, communication, and customized information. This proactive strategy improves communication and facilitates th? smooth completion of th? installation project for high-power EV charging plug bays.

Personal reflection

This project improved project management abilities by highlighting how crucial it is to apply academic knowledge to practical situations. It identified areas in n??d of d?v?lopm?nt whil? displaying strengths in communication and strategic planning. Important lessons learned war th? importance of flexibility in project management and th? necessity of ongoing education. Through th? d?v?lopm?nt of leadership and communication abilities, th? ?xp?ri?nc? off?r insights into successful stak?hold?rs ?ngag?m?nt. Proactive risk management and an emphasis on adaptation will be ?ss?ntial going ahead to ensure th? success of complicated projects.

Conclusion

Tesco's forecourt installation of high-power EV charging stations is an important step toward th? UK's climate goals. By means of rigorous project, planning that includes valuations, approvals, design, procurement, installation, and monitoring, T?sco is positioned as a pion??r in sustainability and th? infrastructure facilitates th? adoption of ?l?ctric vehicles on a larger scale. Even though th? project requires sophisticated technology integration and stak?hold?rs alignment, ?x?cution r?sili?nc? is fostered by strong scheduling, risk mitigation, and communication techniques. This project allows T?sco to properly b?st an urgent n??d whil? also providing an example for other firms to follow, with both societal and competitive benefits.

References

Journals

• Adams, R.V. and Blair, E., 2019. Impact of time management behaviors on undergraduate engineering students' performance. Sage Open, 9(1), p.2158244018824506.
• Ahmadi, A., 2019. Jurnal Time Scheduling and Cost of The Indonesian Navy Ship Development Project Using Network Diagram and Earned Value Method (Evm)(Case Study of Fast Missile Boat Development). International Journal of ASRO, 9(2), pp.87-106.
• Amri, A.U. and Latief, Y., 2020. A Work Breakdown Structure Based Material Requirement Planning Information System Using Building Information Modeling for Flat Construction Project. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 17(2-3), pp.1117-1126.
• Cakmakci, M., 2019. Interaction in project management approach within industry 4.0. In Advances in Manufacturing II: Volume 1-Solutions for Industry 4.0 (pp. 176-189). Springer International Publishing.
• Gatti, S., 2023. Project finance in theory and practice: designing, structuring, and financing private and public projects. Elsevier.
• Hadwiansyah, R. and Latief, Y., 2022, March. Structural Equation Model (SEM) Correlation Between Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), Work Method and Risk Towards Cost Of Safety On Low-Cost Apartments Project. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1232, No. 1, p. 012006). IOP Publishing.
• Jamnuch, R. and Vatanawood, W., 2019, July. Transforming activity network diagram with timed Petri nets. In 2019 12th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS) (pp. 125-129). IEEE.
• Lock, D., 2020. Project management. Routledge.
• Naufal, A.M., Yufrizal, A.H., Latief, Y. and Machfudiyanto, R.A., 2021, November. Development Standard Operational Procedure of Safety Architecture Work in University of Indonesia Project Based on Work Breakdown Structure to Reduce Work Accidents. In Journal of International Conference Proceedings (Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 254-263).
• Ninan, J., 2020. Online naturalistic inquiry in project management research: Directions for research. Project leadership and society, 1, p.100002.
• Pasaribu, B., Latief, Y. and Riantini, L.S., 2019, April. Development of Risk-Based Standardized Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) to Improve Quality Planning of Drainage Construction Work. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 258, No. 1, p. 012054). IOP Publishing.
• Portny, J.L. and Portny, S.E., 2022. Project management for dummies. John Wiley & Sons.
• Rush, D.E. and Connolly, A.J., 2020. An agile framework for teaching with scrum in the IT project management classroom. Journal of Information Systems Education.
• Sitohang, D., Latief, Y. and Riantini, L.S., 2019, April. Development of risk-based work breakdown structure (WBS) standard to improve scheduling planning of airport construction work. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 258, No. 1, p. 012052). IOP Publishing.
• Tereso, A., Ribeiro, P., Fernandes, G., Loureiro, I. and Ferreira, M., 2019. Project management practices in private organizations. Project Management Journal, 50(1), pp.6-22.
• Tinsley, R., 2022. Advanced Project Financing Structuring Risk. Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC.
• Venkataraman, R.R. and Pinto, J.K., 2023. Cost and value management in projects. John Wiley & Sons.
• Zhang, Q., Yang, S., Liao, P.C. and Chen, W., 2020. Influence mechanisms of factors on project management capability. Journal of management in engineering, 36(5), p.04020045.