Organisational Structures and Culture Case Study

Task 1

Section 1: Organisational Structure, Culture, and Politics

Assessment of the organisational structure and map out the organisational chart

Organisational Structure Overview and Organisational Chart Mapping

Hierarchy

The hierarchical organisational structure of the Fire Brigades Union is a reflection of the union's chain of command. The General Secretary, who sits at the top and is in charge of the union's general operations, collaborates closely with the Executive Council, which is made up of elected officials from different areas.

• Regional Representatives
• Executive Council
• General Secretary
• Local Members and Branches (Wright, Moore and Taylor, 2022)

Clear lines of authority and responsibility are made possible by this hierarchical structure, which is crucial in an emergency service situation when prompt and decisive action is frequently required.

Functional Departments

Each of the functional departments that make up the FBU is in charge of particular facets of union operations. Typical departments consist of:

• Operational Department: Deals with day-to-day operations and works with local branches and regional delegates to resolve issues raised by members.
• Public relations and communications: oversees internal and external communication, making sure that media relations and messaging are successful.
• Training and Development: Assures members have the skills required for their positions by offering continuous training (Davis et al., 2020).

The union's broad goals and objectives are accomplished via the cooperation of these divisions.

Role of Organisational Culture and Its Influence on Employee Behaviour in the Fire Brigades Union (FBU)

Workers at the Fire Brigades Union (FBU), an emergency services organisation, are shaped in large part by their organisational culture. The principles of professionalism, camaraderie, and a dedication to safeguarding the well-being of its members are fundamental to the culture of the FBU. The FBU's organisational culture has been significantly shaped by the government and oversight agencies. The FBU's practises and procedures are influenced by government norms and regulations, especially those that pertain to emergency services. As an example, the FBU's culture places a high value on following procedures and safety requirements, which reflects the larger regulatory framework. Internal and external monitoring organisations play a significant role in forming the culture of the FBU by placing a strong emphasis on openness and accountability. Internal systems like performance reviews and peer evaluations support a professional and ever-improving culture. Regulatory oversight from the outside guarantees that the FBU upholds strong service delivery standards, encouraging accountability and responsiveness (Aida and Abadiyah, 2022). Overall, the interaction between governmental laws and oversight agencies has a big impact on the FBU's organisational culture. Employee behaviour is subsequently shaped by this, encouraging a sense of responsibility, adherence to safety regulations, and a dedication to the principles that characterise the emergency services industry.

The roles can be additionally described in the below given table:

Impact of Government Policies and Monitoring Organizations on the Fire Brigades Union (FBU)

The policies of both the local and federal governments have a substantial impact on the Fire Brigades Union (FBU), an emergency services organisation. These policies have a distinct effect on the goals and operations of the FBU. In addition, monitoring organisations play a critical role in guaranteeing responsibility and following rules inside the FBU.

1. Effect of Local Government Policies: The FBU's daily operations, resource allocation, and emergency response plans are directly impacted by local government policies. The FBU's ability to make investments in personnel, training initiatives, and equipment is impacted by the financial allocations for fire and rescue services that are frequently set by local authorities. The FBU's cooperation with other emergency services and community involvement programmes are also shaped by local regulations. The FBU's allocation of resources towards educational programmes and community activities may be influenced by a local government's emphasis on community outreach and fire prevention efforts. On the other hand, certain municipal regulations could have an effect on hiring practises, purchasing equipment, or creating reaction teams with specialised training based on local requirements (Fire Brigades Union,2023).
2. Impact of Central Government Policies: In line with national standards and goals, central government policies offer a more comprehensive framework that directs the FBU's overall approach. The central government's regulations pertaining to safety standards, emergency response protocols, and inter-agency cooperation have a substantial impact on the operational operations of the FBU. National policy could, for example, establish training criteria for firefighters, prescribe disaster response procedures, or set aside money to purchase uniform equipment for use by all fire and rescue agencies. To guarantee consistency and effectiveness in emergency services across the country, the FBU must coordinate its operations with these national policies (Alojail and Khan, 2023).
3. Monitoring Organisations' Role: In order to maintain accountability inside the FBU, monitoring organizations both internal and external are essential. Regular evaluations of the FBU's adherence to set rules and standards are conducted by external regulatory organisations, governmental agencies, and audit firms. These oversight systems support efficacy, openness, and public confidence. External audits assess the FBU's emergency response effectiveness overall as well as its compliance with safety rules and resource management procedures. These evaluations play a crucial role in keeping the FBU answerable to the public and government, guaranteeing that funds are used efficiently and that services adhere to regulations. The FBU uses quality assurance procedures, peer reviews, and performance evaluations internally to keep an eye on its own procedures. Internal oversight guarantees the organization's continued accountability from local branches to individual firefighters (Alderman, 2022).
4. Government Policies and Monitoring Organisations Work Together Synergistically: Upholding accountability in public services is a common aim shared by government policies and monitoring organisations. While monitoring organisations check compliance, pinpoint areas for improvement, and reassure the public that public resources are spent properly, government regulations create the framework, norms, and expectations.
5. When it comes to the FBU, external monitoring organisations help to keep emergency services improving by pointing out best practises, suggesting improvements, and making sure the organisation is adaptable to changing circumstances (Alderman, 2022).

Assessing Monitoring and Accountability in the Fire Brigades Union (FBU)

The efficient administration of public resources is essential to the function of the Fire Brigades Union (FBU), a crucial emergency services organisation. This evaluation examines the role that the FBU's primary structural components—the chain of command, span of control, lines of authority, and centralization/decentralization—have in oversight and accountability.

Chain of Command:

The FBU has a well-defined chain of command, with the General Secretary at the top and local branches and regional representatives at the operational level. For the purpose of upholding discipline, guaranteeing effective decision-making, and promoting communication, this hierarchical structure is crucial. The FBU's chain of command facilitates accountability by delegating tasks at different levels. But it's critical to keep assessing if this framework is still adaptable enough to deal with changing emergency scenarios (Maher, Bateman and Randall, 2019).

Get Extra 10% OFF on your WhatsApp order!

use my discount

Span of Control:

The FBU's span of control is created to strike a balance between efficient operations and capable leadership. Local branches are supervised by regional representatives who also manage resources and respond to issues. Although accountability is improved by a controllable span of control, it is crucial to periodically determine if modifications are required in light of changing needs. While an excessively wide range of power may jeopardise supervision, a small span might result in micromanagement (Maher, Bateman and Randall, 2019).

Lines of Authority:

The FBU has well defined lines of authority, with the General Secretary, Executive Council, and regional delegates holding the ability to make decisions. Because every level is accountable for its activities, accountability is ensured. Still, ongoing evaluation is required to match authority structures to changing needs. It's important to keep up effective avenues of communication, and robust feedback and reporting processes are essential for promoting accountability across the whole organisation (FBU, 2010).

The Central and Decentralised Systems:

Centralization and decentralisation are kept in check by the FBU. Although certain guidelines and norms are established nationally to guarantee uniformity, regional delegates possess independence in customising tactics to suit specific requirements. This harmony promotes flexibility while guaranteeing compliance with national policies. Periodic reviews are necessary to make sure that the degree of centralization facilitates effective resource distribution and cooperative decision-making without impeding regional efforts.

Monitoring and Accountability Mechanisms:

The FBU uses a number of techniques to guarantee efficient oversight and responsibility:

• Performance Assessments: Conducting routine reviews of both individual and group performance helps to ensure accountability. These evaluations are in line with the FBU's dedication to professionalism and ongoing development.
• Training Programmes: Ongoing training projects help FBU members become more skilled while also acting as a watchdog. Training results give information on how well-equipped and capable the organisation is to handle emergencies.
• Additional Audits: The FBU is subject to audits and inspections as a result of its partnerships with government agencies and other monitoring organisations. By guaranteeing adherence to guidelines and regulations, this external examination improves responsibility (Crown,2013).

Challenges and Recommendations:

Even though the structural components of the FBU are generally successful, there are still issues. Because emergencies are dynamic in nature, structures must be reviewed often to ensure their continued adaptability. Strong lines of communication are also necessary to guarantee that information moves smoothly up the chain of command.

Suggested actions comprise:

• Frequent Structural Audits: The FBU can stay responsive and flexible by identifying areas for improvement and bottlenecks through periodic examinations of the organisational structure.
• Technological Integration: By using technology for data management and transmission, monitoring capabilities may be improved and real-time operational insights can be obtained.

Task 2

Section 2: Managing the Public Sector

Management Approaches and Styles in the Fire Brigades Union (FBU)

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) is a unique organisation that combines democratic decision-making, authoritative leadership, and a dedication to the welfare and professional advancement of its members. By using ideas from motivation and management theories, it is possible to clarify a number of important issues of FBU management.

1. Transformational Leadership: The FBU exemplifies transformational leadership, especially in the person of its dynamic General Secretary, who inspires and motivates members. The notion of transformational leadership states that leaders that adopt this approach promote creativity, cultivate a common goal, and boost team morale and motivation. Members are given a sense of direction and commitment by the General Secretary, who does this via excellent communication and loyalty to the FBU's principles (Curral et al., 2023).
2. Participative Decision-Making: In line with ideas such as the Vroom-Yetton-Jago Normative Decision Model, the FBU promotes participatory decision-making. In emergency services, decisions frequently need to be made quickly. Involving pertinent stakeholders in the decision-making process guarantees a more thorough grasp of the problems and possible solutions. Local branches and regional representatives actively participate in decision-making procedures, encouraging a sense of accountability and ownership (Särdqvist, Jonsson and Grimwood, 2018).
3. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: The FBU bases its approach to employee motivation on the notion of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. By meeting their basic needs for safety through demanding training programmes, fostering a supportive organisational culture that gives them a sense of belonging and self-worth, and creating opportunities for self-actualization through ongoing learning and professional development, the FBU acknowledges the intrinsic motivation of its member (Särdqvist, Jonsson and Grimwood, 2018) s.
4. Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory: The FBU places a strong focus on preventing unhappiness and promoting job satisfaction, both of which are in line with Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, which makes a distinction between motivators and hygiene elements. While recognition, chances for promotion, and difficult work serve as motivators, enough pay, job stability, and safe working environment address hygiene factors. This all-encompassing strategy promotes a happy workplace and long-term employee motivation.

Examples:

Leadership in Times of Crisis: The FBU's leadership takes a transformative stance in times of crisis, offering members unambiguous direction and assistance. This was made clear during [particular occurrence], when the General Secretary's leadership and communication were essential in inspiring members to carry out their responsibilities well.

Programmes for Training and Development: The FBU makes large investments in training and development, in line with ideas that highlight the significance of worker development and self-actualization. One way to show a commitment to staff development is to put in place advanced training programmes for addressing new technology or changing emergency circumstances.

Decision-Making Process Inclusivity: Local branches and regional representatives actively engage in decision-making about the distribution of resources and operating plans. By ensuring that choices are based on the knowledge and experience of people who are actually making the work, this participatory method fosters a culture of accountability and collaboration.

To sum up, in order to develop a dynamic and driven workforce, the Fire Brigades Union uses transformational leadership, participatory decision-making, and motivation theories in its management techniques and styles. These methods, which emphasise the value of human well-being, leadership, and teamwork in accomplishing organisational objectives, are in line with the particular difficulties faced by emergency services (Särdqvist, Jonsson and Grimwood, 2018).

Evaluating Motivation in Public Service Organizations

In public service organisations, motivation is a key notion that affects staff engagement and overall performance. A combination of extrinsic and internal motivators creates a dynamic work environment in the public sector. Driven by a feeling of purpose and the desire to have a good influence, employees' intrinsic gratification in helping the community is the source of intrinsic motivation. Attracting and keeping talent also heavily depends on extrinsic factors, such as competitive pay and benefits, job stability, and recognition. In the public sector, job satisfaction frequently depends on how significant the work is viewed to be, with employees being motivated by the knowledge that their jobs improve the community. Opportunities for career development and recognition, which highlight workers' accomplishments and offer paths for advancement, can boost motivation (Sadiq, 2017). Employee dedication and purpose are strengthened when individual jobs are in line with the organization's overall mission and core values. Even if there are obstacles in the form of bureaucratic systems and resource constraints, resolving these problems with open communication, unambiguous career paths, and recognition initiatives is crucial to keeping public servants inspired and committed to their work (Wright, Christensen and Pandey, 2013).

Importance of the concept of organisational behaviour to the performance of teams in the public sector using Johari Window

I will use the Johari Window as a reflecting tool to assess the contribution of the organisational behaviour idea to team performance in the public sector. A model that looks at the connection between group feedback and self-disclosure is called the Johari Window. There are four quadrants in it: Unknown, Hidden, Blind, and Open.

1. In the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) setting, the Open quadrant is very important. In emergency services, team effectiveness depends critically on efficient communication. Information that is known by the group as well as the individual is represented by the Open quadrant. This would entail open communication on operating processes, individual team roles, and emergency response plans in the FBU.
2. The Blind quadrant, which highlights the value of input, is also pertinent. Feedback systems are essential for ongoing progress in the FBU. For example, following an incident response, the team can hold debriefings during which members evaluate each other's performance. This increases the effectiveness of the team as a whole by fostering a culture of learning and adaptability.
3. Personal information that is known to the individual but kept private from the team is included in the Hidden quadrant. Even while some personal experiences may not immediately relate to emergency response, getting to know team members personally helps promote a positive work atmosphere. Team-building exercises and projects that let members talk about non-operational parts of their lives can help the FBU grow as a unit and foster understanding.
4. Lastly, the knowledge that neither the group nor the individual is aware of is represented by the Unknown quadrant. This may include unanticipated difficulties or newly developing patterns in the emergency services dynamic. Recognising this quadrant promotes a proactive approach by forcing the FBU to keep up with technology breakthroughs, safety procedures, and firefighting technique advancements that may have an effect on team performance (Miao et al., 2018).

A thoughtful framework for comprehending the dynamics of organisational behaviour within the Fire Brigades Union is provided by the Johari Window. Enhancing team performance in the public sector—especially in emergency services—requires focusing on the Open quadrant for open communication, incorporating feedback in the Blind quadrant for ongoing improvement, and addressing the Hidden quadrant for team-building initiatives.

References

• Aida, P.R. and Abadiyah, R., 2022. The Influence of Organizational Culture, Perceived Organizational Support on Employee Performance with Organizational Citizenship Behavior as Intervening Variable. Academia Open, [online] 7. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.7.2022.3249.
• Alderman, L., 2022. The Continuous Learning Framework: Applying accountability for widespread organisational change. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, [online] 22(4), pp.206–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x221120294.
• Alojail, M. and Khan, S.B., 2023. Impact of Digital Transformation toward Sustainable Development. Sustainability, [online] 15(20), p.14697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014697.
• Anon 2011. Organizational Traps: Leadership, Culture, Organizational Design. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, [online] 32(2), pp.214–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111113015.
• Anon 2022. The Impact Of Organisational Goals On Organisation Behaviour. Central European Management Journal. [online] https://doi.org/10.57030/23364890.cemj.30.1.1.
• Anon n.d. Policies | Fire Brigades Union. [online] Available at: <https://www.fbu.org.uk/policies>.
• Buttery, M., Johnson, L.W. and Campbell, G.E., 2023. How Does Organisational Culture Affect Employees’ Perception of the Brand in Service Industries? Businesses, [online] 3(1), pp.52–66. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses3010004.
• Crown, 2013. Fire and Rescue Authorities Health, safety and welfare framework for the operational environment. Department for Communities and Local Government.
• Curral, L., Carmona, L., Pinheiro, R., Reis, V. and Chambel, M.J., 2023. The Effect of Leadership Style on Firefighters Well-Being during an Emergency. Fire, [online] 6(6), p.233. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6060233.
• Davis, A.L., Allen, J., Shepler, L., Resick, C., Lee, J., Marinucci, R. and Taylor, J.A., 2020. Moving FOCUS – The Fire Service Organizational Culture of Safety survey – From research to practice. Journal of Safety Research, [online] 74, pp.233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.06.011.
• Maher, K., Bateman, N. and Randall, R., 2019. Fire and rescue operational effectiveness: the effect of alternative crewing patterns. Production Planning & Control, [online] 31(14), pp.1195–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1701232.
• Miao, Q., Eva, N., Newman, A. and Schwarz, G., 2018. Public service motivation and performance: The role of organizational identification. Public Money & Management, [online] 39(2), pp.77–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1556004.
• Sadiq, S., 2017. Evaluation of Public Service Motivation: A Case Study of Hefei Public Sector Organizations. Business and Economic Research, [online] 8(1), p.186. https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v8i1.12530.
• Särdqvist, S., Jonsson, A. and Grimwood, P., 2018. Three Different Fire Suppression Approaches Used by Fire and Rescue Services. Fire Technology, [online] 55(3), pp.837–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0797-9.
• The Fire Brigades Union, 2010. Falling to the lowest common denominator Rising to the challenge? How the Audit Commission got it wrong on the fire service. https://www.fbu.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/6119FBUAuditReport.pdf. The Fire Brigades Union.
• Wright, B.E., Christensen, R.K. and Pandey, S.K., 2013. Measuring Public Service Motivation: Exploring the Equivalence of Existing Global Measures. International Public Management Journal, [online] 16(2), pp.197–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2013.817242.
• Wright, T., Moore, S. and Taylor, P., 2022. Union Equality Structures and the Challenge of Democratic Legitimacy: The Case of the Fire Brigades Union. Work, Employment and Society, [online] 37(5), pp.1339–1358. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211072796.