20 Pages
4882 Words
Theory on Paramount Diner's Operations and Productivity
Introduction
The Swift Even Flow Theory and its effects on the efficiency and effective performance of the example offered, which is that of Paramount Diner, were given specific attention in this study. The concepts of production variability will be a main topic of discussion in the paragraphs that follow. The microeconomics theory is applied to figure out labour productivity. In the end, the idea is employed to support the manager's effects on the business and how the restaurant's productivity development is impacted.
1. Essay on The Theory Of Swift Even Flow
A solution to the problem of differences in manufacturing productivity is the Theory of Swift, Even Flow. In accordance with the Theory of Swift and Even Flow, action is more successful and quicker when more evenly resources are transferred among it. Because of this, the efficiency of any procedure whether it be worker productivity, equipment productivity, supply productivity, or the productivity of all factors increases in tandem with the pace at the materials flow through the procedure, and it decreases along with increases in the procedure's oscillations, whether that variation is related to the procedure's consumer appetite or to defines in the procedure's own growth (Fredendall, et. al, 2009).
To realize the idea of swift, equal flow, regardless of how productivity is measured, only two parts and two variables are needed. Keeping variation to a minimum is the first and most crucial approach. The three basic categories of variation are those relating to quantity, quality, and timing. In other words, the objective is to reduce errors and produce goods of the highest quality first, then balance the variety of articles generated and the quantity produced of every item to ensure that each manufacturing day appears to be the same, and third, produce in accordance with a regular schedule or order (Onofrei, et. al, 2021). Determining how long it must take to develop from beginning to end and minimizing it as much as possible for the company can is the second important component. By emphasizing the movement of components across a process, a swift, even flow allows individuals to develop knowledge of what is happening throughout an operation. In order to decrease the non-value-added manufacturing processes that are where the costs and inefficiencies are, Paramount Diner may shorten the variance in processing times for certain items.
The following theoretical ideas must first be understood in order to fully understand this theory:
Working with and without value addition are key principles. Theoretically, every action may be characterized as offering benefits in both directions. While labor that moves resources, organizes them into databases, checks them, counts them, or fixes them is not thought of as value-added labor, it is when it converts basic materials into products of a higher caliber. Non-value addition is anything that causes a process to produce waste (Lohmer and Lasch, 2020). Knowing this, consumables could go through a process at Paramount Diner more rapidly if non-value-added, ineffective operations are deleted or substantially decreased.
Similar to people, materials can only travel fast if the path is clear of any impediments. To make up for this, the idea adheres to a second period of time called "throughput time," which serves as a useful indicator of the rate of flow when compared to the period from when the components for example of merchandise start to be produced until when the component is finished and sent directly to the end-user or a finished warehouse for preservation. The idea promotes the process such that it can take less time (the throughput time) to set up the clock in this way but maintaining everything else is constant (Devaraj, et. al, 2013). Finding the places where flows have slowed down or been blocked may be done extremely effectively using throughput time.
The third scientific methodological concept is then employed in order to remove the non-added procedures and behaviors from the current functions. Then, throughout the operations, value-added processes take the place of those non-value-adding procedures. The idea corrects scientific approaches using statistical data in order to recognize non-value-added activity and close gaps in the operational process (Schmenner and Swink, 1998). When used in non-value-added processes, such scientific procedures can occasionally become redundant.
Quality is the fourth and last tenet. When there is a process outflow owing to subpar rework, interrupted flow materials, obsolete equipment, and other factors, the quality principle aids Paramount Diner in identifying the negative aspects of the operation. The idea is beneficial for reducing variability since it aids in avoiding the gaps that appear throughout operations.
With the help of factory-focus concepts, Paramount Diner may minimize variability and enhance efficiency by concentrating on the quality and quantity of the products. When related goods are grouped together more closely, it is simpler to trace the flow of manufacturing supplies and remove non-value-added items. The factory flow theory is based on three tenets: adding a delivery period to the manufacturing process, ensuring that the production process is quick, and consistent as well as quality checks throughout the entirety of the procedure. The post-processing rounds of manufacturing are another name for these three steps.
The Swift Flow Theory has a big impact on what it means for operation managers. The theory establishes the efficiency increase in operations that are utilized to predict upcoming outflow. The theory itself favors compact arrangements and the formation of cells. When the flows are emphasized by the cells, the production speed of an item is accelerated, and when comparable products are combined, the variability is reduced. It is also backed by the theory that in order to increase production pace, stocks must be reduced. This allows items to flow more quickly.
The idea does not have any implications for inventories or unfinished goods. Only the effort that assists the Paramount Diner in decreasing variances and developing regulations that support flow speed is supported by theory. The notion of quick flow also supports the efficiency of the supply chain (Keskinocak and Savva, 2020). A solid connection connecting the flow of goods and their final user is necessary for optimal efficiency and recognition, which also facilitates the shipping process.
The hypothesis suggests that a number of methods for performance used by the organization should be dropped. According to the idea, the flow variation should be measured using labour productivity and the utilization of production machinery. When assessing how to measure productivity flow, appropriate approaches should be taken into account. Additionally, it disapproves of using personal hours and working hours as a way to correct flow fluctuation. In order to boost productivity, the argument is made that capital should be used instead of labour. According to the notion, in order to boost the supply of resources intensive, continuous flow systems are more beneficial than productive ways. As a result, high efficiency cannot be attained using continuous flow system techniques since there is a larger instead, resource allocation that occurs when the production's parameters are less fluid or stationary (Helper, et. al, 2021).
The uniform flow of materials, which shortens processing times and eliminates gaps and visibility issues, is one advantage that the theory offers. An improvement in the calibre of the food offered can lead to greater satisfaction among consumers and a decrease in the percentage of returns. Focusing on quality is the key component of the theory (Mercan, et. al, 2021). As the demand for trips to Paramount increases, the price per unit will have an effect on the earnings. This theory has two major problems: a lack of relational coordination and a lack of standardization procedure. When everyone is brought together, a greater thinking ability is accessible in the course of the activity (Schmenner, 2004). An identical set of laws and regulations are useful in challenging circumstances. The idea behind quality assurance is furthered by the application of additional methods like lean or the Six Sigma rule.
In order to keep the flow of materials uninterrupted, the ambiguity related to operational and demanding processes needs to be reduced. The consumer's demand as well as the variability in time spent is utilized to quantify timing and quantity. Variability is reduced when the requirements put on the process are consistent and uniform. Plans for production with "level" timetables or quantities produce more than those with chaotic timetables or quantities. Due to the need being more stable, there are fewer variances in the time and volume of the desire. When related topics are dealt with simultaneously, variability is reduced. Production will therefore increase whenever related jobs can be accomplished simultaneously without slowing the process.
To ensure a more consistent flow of materials, the fluctuation related to the necessity of the technique or the operational steps of the processes must be reduced (Schmenner, 2012). A variety of metrics are used to measure variation, including the length of time needed for various process steps, the variance or standard deviation of the necessary volumes, and the variability in scheduling. When the approach under consideration must satisfy symmetrical and consistent constraints, variability is reduced (McCrie and Lee, 2021). Compared to proposals with erratic quantities or due dates, manufacturing plans with "level" quantities or time constraints are more successful. Less fluctuation in the length of time and quantity sought is an indication that demand is more constant. When related items happen concurrently, variability is also reduced. As a result, productivity will rise each time similar tasks may be completed simultaneously without causing any disruptions to the entire process.
2. Process Analysis
2a: Quantitative analysis
Orders/ preparation of food |
Drinks |
Eat |
Number of chefs = 4 Operation time per customer = 40 sec Capacity = 1/operation time = 1*60*60 divided by 40 = 90 customers. The restaurant will serve 90 customers per sec in operation 1. |
Availability of staff = 2. Average time for serving per customer = 45 sec Payment time (average) = 1 minute per customer 2.6 customers per customer = 60 divided by 2.6 = 23.07 seconds per party. 1 divided by cycle of operation = customer = 1*60*60*2/ 68.07 = 106 customers per hour. The restaurant will serve 106 customers per second in operation 2. |
The seating capacity = 80/40*100 = 35.2 19 minutes is the average easting time per customer 1/ cycle of operation = capacity = 1*60*35/19 = 2100/ 19 = 111 customers every hour. The restaurant will serve 111 customers in operation 3. |
2b: Explain how the unusual seating policy is an operations management tool
Compared to other restaurants, Paramount Diner has a completely unusual seating policy. Customers are not permitted to take a seat at the tables until they have paid. Due to the buzz of people arriving at the restaurant, the management of the restaurant implemented this regulation because there are only a limited number of tables available (Ganbold, et. al, 2020). Early arrivals can place their orders, pay for them, and then take a seat until the other customers wait for their turn to be called out (Frei, 2006). Using this seating arrangement, the tables are being utilized.
Customers arrival rate
Time Slot |
Number of customers arriving per hour from Exhibit 6 |
Number of customers baulking or reneging per hour from Exhibit 7 |
The net number of customers arriving per hour |
Adjust to a nearest whole number
|
7:30am – 8:30am |
35 + 45 = 80 |
15 |
65 |
65 |
8:30am – 9:30am |
35 + 42 = 77 |
4 + 12 = 16 |
61 |
60 |
9:30am – 10:30am |
42 + 92 = 134 |
21 + 30 = 51 |
134 – 51 = 83 |
80 |
10:30 am – 11:30 am |
47 + 61 = 108 |
27 + 18 = 45 |
108 – 45 = 63 |
60 |
11:30 am – 12:30 pm |
26 + 50 = 76 |
21 + 5 = 26 |
76 – 26 = 50 |
50 |
12:30 pm – 1:30 pm |
46 + 22 = 68 |
11 + 7 = 18 |
68 – 18 = 50 |
50 |
ρ^ /(μ(1-ρ))
= 0.888/(90(1-0.888))
= 0.888/(90 x 0.112)
= 0.888/10.08
=0.0889
The number of customers in the system on an average is
L_q = ρ^2/((1-ρ))
=?(0.889)?^2/((1-0.889))
= 0.790/0.111
=7.12 customers
Lq= 7.12 + 35 = 42.12 persons.
Therefore it will take 42.12 on Saturday.
Worker's utilization
Case 1:
Based on 90 hour per customer
Therefore the wait time will be wq
= 42.12 x 1.5
=63.18 minutes
The number of customers waiting outside before the restaurant opens was 35.
If there are 90 customers per hour,
Then: 42.12 * 1.5 = 63.18 minutes.
On Saturday morning, a customer would wait 63.18 minutes equivalent too (3,790.8seconds).
Case 2:
Allowing 10% of the 90 serviceable customer orders to be carryout orders would reduce the restaurant's capacity to 90 - 9 = 81.
Utilization of worker |
Line of other customers while preparing the carryout order |
y/u = P = 80/81 P = 0.98 |
Wq = p/ u*(1-p) = 0.98/ 81*(1-0.98) Wq = 0.98/ 1.62 = 1.58 W = 1/u*(1-p) = 1/81*(1-0.98) = 50 |
3. Introduction Of Variability In Customer Service
3a: Use the knowledge acquired to discuss how customers introduce variability for the Paramount
The difficulty of making money is the main problem that variability has caused for the restaurant. The operations management theory advises that in order to conquer this difficulty, variability must be reduced (Sasser, 1976). The flexibility of Paramount's clients allows for the development of novel approaches that manage the company and exacerbate problems. According to the principle of operational management, it's crucial to eliminate variability.
Because it allows consumers to review their overall satisfaction, the choice to remove variation in service to consumers is not a good one. Another justification for this action is that, while it is simpler on the business's end, it becomes challenging in the customer service sector since quality cannot be controlled. The reaction of the customers and their experiences have an impact on profitability (Feng and Ye, 2021). For management, it's beneficial to introduce some sort of variety. The clients of Paramount are able to try out novel approaches in a variety of situations, which results in company management and escalating problems. According to the management of operations philosophy, eliminating variability is crucial since it poses a danger to quality. The clients' propensity is to voice their complaints. Customers are regarded as the key source of revenue for each service provider, thus management must always take their requests into account. Due to their emotional nature, customers are greatly impacted by fluctuation. The novel variations comprise:
Capability variability
If someone visiting must wait too long to receive their food, they may complain to the establishment. Capability variability refers to the seating policy that was previously addressed. To administer the adopted seating policy successfully, communication is necessary. For the patrons waiting in line, the restaurant must provide a suitable area to sit. Between service providers and clients, effective management is required to combat this unpredictability.
Arrival variability
Customers at Paramount had to wait patiently for their turn to be called. There are often lines of patrons waiting to enter the eateries. The service providers are unable to deliver services to clients when the time is unfavourable for them (Cachon, et. al, 2020). Customers arrive at various times, they desire various services, and this occurs every day. Because the clients must wait for their opportunity, the atmosphere is simply distinct on weekend days. Customers are let down as a result and have a negative experience. Online appointment scheduling is the greatest approach to keep consumers pleased. Making reservations for tables in advance is a wonderful strategy to reduce arrival wiggle room.
Subject preference variability
When clients waited for their number to be called, Paramount treated them with respect and care in an effort to make these individuals feel at ease. Customers waiting at Paramount can get refreshments from the crew. The staff can provide extra chairs for individuals who have been waiting to help them surmount this obstacle.
Effort variability
The effort clients make at the service interface is known as effort variability. The major problem for Paramount is long wait times. Customers who come to eat their meals are unhappy if they have to wait, thus in this situation, the customers typically go back to a different restaurant. As a result, Paramount experiences a decline in earnings. To address this issue, the restaurant could recruit additional cooks and staff to serve its patrons and promote more take-out orders.
Request variability
The Paramount faces a dilemma as a result of this unpredictability since one kind of command might be replaced by another. Customers have the option to request dishes that aren't even on the menu. This problem may be resolved by Paramount by enforcing a no-substitution policy and ensuring the menu is strictly complied with. Customers are not given deliveries of orders that don't fit the menu.
3b: Discuss whether the Paramount accommodates or reduces this type of variability
The explanation and analysis above make it abundantly evident that Paramount can take into account these customer-presented variations that are common in the service industry. The largest difficulty that the outlet must overcome is the variety of arrivals. The second issue is capability variability, which has to be resolved. According to arrival time, Paramount must notify its customers. The unusual seating arrangement poses a serious issue. The third factor is effort variability since long-line clients frequently baulk or back out. Regarding these difficulties, accommodating their clients is what Paramount must do. The implementation of automated devices should be available to serve consumers, and solutions for Paramount include a self-service policy, online reservations, carryout orders, and takeout.
4. The Issue Of Carry Out Orders
4a: Where has the idea for carryout orders come from?
Customers become reluctant to take advantage of opportunities when they have to wait too long for them to arrive, which discourages them from doing so. Carryout is your finest bet for averting this kind of circumstance. The preference of customers is for their items to be delivered rather than standing in lengthy lines. The majority of consumers passed out as they waited for their number to arrive (Atasu et al., 2020). Due to Paramount's limited capacity to serve forty-four patrons at once, consumers choose takeout or meal delivery via the Internet. The lack of room was a source of discomfort for both the consumers and the workers who served them. The workers cannot conduct their duties or provide services since there is nowhere to do so.
As soon as the management became aware of the issue, they made the decision to start offering carry-outs in an effort to decrease the total number of customers who dined in and raise the lost revenue. As soon as Michael Conlon became aware of his client's issues, he made the decision to assist them online. In essence, it is simple for clients and management since neither party must rush and neither party must stand in line (Akyuz and Gursoy, 2020). The effectiveness and income stream of the company has risen because of this concept. The business may simply grow as a result of technological advancement and smartphone usage. The outlet can expand more quickly and form partnerships with other outlets if internet access and communication systems are fast.
The Paramount management seeks to strike an equilibrium between the two divisions. Each segment has two parts: a serving segment and a delivery section. Maximum gain for both parties is a result of the balance. These 10 per cent of customers are highly helpful since they will urge their friends and family to choose takeout over delivery and will spread the word about the delivery services. The management may concentrate on and make further improvements to the dine-in sector independently after the delivery segment has been modified and proven effective.
4b: What are the business motivations for adding this type of service?
The notion of carrying out was conceived with the intention of decreasing the length of lines outside the premises of the restaurant. All incoming orders that are scheduled to be collected up by delivery services must be attended to by the chef. The number of people waiting outside restaurants in large lines has decreased as a result. The restaurant's major business goal is to increase profits by offering carry-out and dine-in options. When assessing how to measure productivity flow, appropriate approaches should be taken into account. Additionally, it disapproves of the use of personal hours and working hours as a corrective mechanism for flow variance (Zhang, et. al, 2021). In order to boost productivity, the argument is made that capital should be used instead of labour.
Conlon needs to add more people to his team in order to grow it. New chefs must be hired for the restaurant in order to manage take-out orders, and new employees must be hired in order to manage time, effort, delivery, and customer service. Knowing the interests and preferences of clients might inspire the company. In order to inspire the employees, Paramount should provide them with morning delights like coffee and food. The day will begin with a kickoff. Having a successful celebration is another approach to inspire (Benjaafar and Hu, 2020).
4c: What impact will adding this service have on the restaurant customer experience?
By accepting more carry-out orders, the customer experience may be improved. Sales at Paramount will increase as a result of delivery services. Customers are made to feel somewhat unfavourably by the seating arrangement described above since they must first pay before receiving their food and then stand in a long queue. When there were a lot of people waiting outdoors the restaurant, customers would often return (Dogru and Keskin, 2020). The convenience of not having to leave their homes to enjoy their favourite Paramount dishes makes takeout and delivery orders more popular with customers nowadays. Given that consumers would have the finest experience, the plan will raise restaurant rankings. Paramount will attract more recent clients. Simply, becoming aware of the services it is offering. As the new client enters the restaurant, the income stream will be influenced.
5. Management Decisions
Michael Colon, the manager of Paramount Diner, will find it more beneficial to concentrate more on fulfilling orders. It will be more profitable to provide delivery services along with eat-in options. The use of fresh concepts and tactics is seen as advantageous in the context of a restaurant where customers patiently await their turn (Heizer et al., 2020). Conlon needs to expand the group by taking on new members. He has to hire more cooks for the restaurant in order to manage take-out orders, and he also needs to hire new personnel to manage time, effort, delivery, and customer service. It is important to correctly apply the management. This may be accomplished by creating separate lines at the collecting point for dine-in and takeaway clients. Additionally, this will lead to prompt service for clients with no wasting their time.
The structure may be renovated to increase the space in the area. For the convenience of its consumers, restaurant management might develop an online meal delivery application. Making a team accountable for their spending and money is another action that management may do. Once this is completed, the business's cash flow may be justified more easily. By comparing the expense generated by the management and the revenue generated, it is possible to monitor the profitability of the restaurant (Choi et al., 2022). Customers may place meal orders at any time, any place, with the help of a website. To spread the risk among them, Michael Conlon should include his buddies in his management. The initial carryout order percentage is 10 per cent, but with excellent operational management, it should rise with time. The notion of meal delivery is the finest one since it will assist to lessen the congestion that is being produced in the outlet. The restaurant may make significant revenues by engaging in this approach. The quantity of carry-out orders will rise as a result of all these reasons.
Conclusion
Michael Conlon's business choice will enable Paramount to expand more quickly. To lessen the restaurant's unpredictability, Paramount might engage in a variety of activities. The management is aware of the tastes of its customers and may adjust the menu as necessary. Only the effort that assists the Paramount Diner in decreasing variances and developing regulations that support flow speed is supported by theory. The quick flow idea also supports supply chain efficiency. The relationship between the flow of products and the end user should be strong in order to achieve maximum productivity and popularity, which facilitates the delivery process.
References
Books and Journals
- Akyuz, G.A. and Gursoy, G., 2020. Strategic management perspectives on supply chain. Management Review Quarterly. 70. pp.213-241.
- Atasu, A., Corbett, C.J., Huang, X. and Toktay, L.B., 2020. Sustainable operations management through the perspective of manufacturing & service operations management. Manufacturing & service operations management. 22(1). pp.146-157.
- Benjaafar, S. and Hu, M., 2020. Operations management in the age of the sharing economy: What is old and what is new?. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 22(1). pp.93-101.
- Cachon, G.P., Girotra, K. and Netessine, S., 2020. Interesting, important, and impactful operations management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 22(1). pp.214-222.
- Choi, T.M., Kumar, S., Yue, X. and Chan, H.L., 2022. Disruptive technologies and operations management in the Industry 4.0 era and beyond. Production and Operations Management. 31(1). pp.9-31.
- Devaraj, S., Ow, T.T. and Kohli, R., 2013. Examining the impact of information technology and patient flow on healthcare performance: A Theory of Swift and Even Flow (TSEF) perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 31(4), pp.181-192.
- Dogru, A.K. and Keskin, B.B., 2020. AI in operations management: applications, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Data, Information and Management. 2. pp.67-74.
- Feng, B. and Ye, Q., 2021. Operations management of smart logistics: A literature review and future research. Frontiers of Engineering Management. 8. pp.344-355.
- Fredendall, L.D., Craig, J.B., Fowler, P.J. and Damali, U., 2009. Barriers to swift, even flow in the internal supply chain of perioperative surgical
- Frei, F. X. (2006) “Breaking the trade-off between efficiency and service”, Harvard Business Review, Nov, pp. 92-101
- Ganbold, O., Matsui, Y. and Rotaru, K., 2021. Effect of information technology-enabled supply chain integration on firm's operational performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 34(3). pp.948-989.
- Heizer, J., Render, B., Munson, C.L. and Griffin, P., 2020. Operations management: sustainability and supply chain management. New York, NY: Pearson.
- Helper, S., Gray, J.V., Hughes, M.M. and Roman, A.V., 2021. Public policy and operations management. Journal of Operations Management. 67(7). pp.780-802.
- Keskinocak, P. and Savva, N., 2020. A review of the healthcare-management (modeling) literature published in manufacturing & service operations management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 22(1). pp.59-72.
- Lohmer, J. and Lasch, R., 2020. Blockchain in operations management and manufacturing: Potential and barriers. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 149. p.106789.
- McCrie, R. and Lee, S., 2021. Security operations management. Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Mercan, S., Cain, L., Akkaya, K., Cebe, M., Uluagac, S., Alonso, M. and Cobanoglu, C., 2021. Improving the service industry with hyper-connectivity: IoT in hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 33(1). pp.243-262.
- Onofrei, G., Fynes, B., Nguyen, H. and Azadnia, A.H., 2021. Quality and lean practices synergies: A swift even flow perspective. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 38(1). pp.98-115.
- Sasser, W. E., 1976. “Match supply and demand in service industries”, Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec. pp. 133-140
- Schmenner, R.W., 2004. Service businesses and productivity. Decision Sciences, 35(3), pp.333-347.
- Schmenner, R. W. (2012) Getting and Staying Productive, Applying Swift Even Flow to Practice, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
- Schmenner, R.W. and Swink, M.L., 1998. On theory in operations management. Journal of operations management, 17(1), pp.97-113.
- Zhang, F., Wu, X., Tang, C.S., Feng, T. and Dai, Y., 2020. Evolution of operations management research: From managing flows to building capabilities. Production and Operations Management. 29(10). pp.2219-2229.