Management's Role in Resolving Ethical Conflicts Essay Sample

Introduction To the responsibility of management in resolving conflicts between their moral duty

Management frequently finds itself enmeshed in a web of moral obligations in the complicated world of modern business, trying to balance competing obligations to shareholders, the public, and employees. Maintaining moral corporate conduct and promoting long-term profitability require finding a careful balance. In order to assist in resolving disputes resulting from moral obligations, this article examines the many facets of management responsibilities, referencing pertinent ideas and models.

Balancing Ethical Responsibilities and Shareholder Interests in Modern Management

Examining moral obligations and the ethical frameworks that influence decision-making is the first step in comprehending management's responsibilities. As a guide across the treacherous landscape of competing duties, ethical frameworks act as compasses. Deontology is one such well-known concept that holds that deeds have inherent morality and wrongness independent of their effects. Philosophers such as Immanuel Kant espouse deontology, which emphasises moral principles and responsibility (Babalola et al., 2016). This concept suggests that some behaviours are morally necessary in the context of management, regardless of the results they produce. For instance, regardless of the possible financial repercussions for the company, it is a managerial responsibility to treat staff members fairly and with respect. Deontology gives managers a strong basis on which to maintain their moral obligations. When deontology is used in the business world, ethical duties and widely accepted norms must be carefully considered (Huhtala, Fadjukoff and Kroger, 2020). Deontology demands that moral values take precedence over the responsibility to owners in situations when they conflict, arguing that some moral obligations cannot be compromised. Decision-making based on deontological principles allows management to create a corporate culture that prioritises moral obligations, building integrity and trust both inside and outside the company. But it's important to recognise deontology's possible drawbacks, such its rigidity in some circumstances. The model's emphasis on unwavering moral standards might not always be compatible with the real-world difficulties involved in making commercial decisions. Managers must thus take a balanced approach to deontology, appreciating its advantages in serving as a moral compass but also taking into account the larger context of each ethical conundrum (Nihlén Fahlquist, 2021).

A crucial component of corporate governance is management's duty to owners or shareholders. Conflicts can develop when these duties collide with more general moral principles. The duty of maximising shareholder wealth, which is frequently connected to profit maximisation, falls on management. It is important to approach this task with a sophisticated perspective, acknowledging the need to strike a balance between ethical concerns and financial aims. One hypothetical viewpoint that reveals insight into this obligation is the agency theory. As indicated by this model, managers are viewed as specialists following up in the interest of the proprietors or investors, who are the directors (McCahery and Vermeulen, 2009). The head specialist relationship innately includes a likely irreconcilable circumstance, as directors might be leaned to seek after their own goals to the detriment of investor interests. This system features the significance of adjusting administrative activities to the objectives and assumptions of shareholders. An ethical and strategic strategy is needed to resolve tensions between the obligation owed to owners and larger moral reasons. In order to resolve these disputes, management needs to adopt a stakeholder-oriented approach. The wider stakeholder theory argues that firms should take into account the interests of all stakeholders, including consumers, workers, and the community, while the agency theory emphasises the obligation to shareholders. In order to practise responsible management, decision-making procedures must incorporate the viewpoint of stakeholders (Coelho, McClure and Spry, 2003). Understanding how corporate actions affect different stakeholders allows management to make well-informed decisions that go beyond maximising profits. This might entail taking into account the moral ramifications of commercial operations, such as community involvement, sustainable environmental practises, or fair labour standards. Besides, it is fundamental to cultivate straightforward correspondence with investors. At the point when clashes emerge, open discourse can assist with adjusting assumptions and give investors a superior comprehension of the moral contemplations that impact navigation. This proactive correspondence technique can add to building trust and validity, fundamental components in supporting a positive connection among the board and investors (R.L., 2021).

Navigating Ethical Obligations to Employees: Balancing Fairness, Welfare, and Organizational Goals

The obligation to representatives is a foundation of moral initiative, and clashes might emerge when the board is confronted with choices that challenge the prosperity and interests of their labour force. Mindful administration includes exploring these struggles with a guarantee of representative government assistance and the more extensive moral ramifications of hierarchical choices. One applicable system for understanding this obligation is John Rawls' equity hypothesis. Rawls contends for an origination of equity that focuses on decency and equivalent open doors (Feri, 2021). Applied to the executive's obligations, this hypothesis suggests that choices ought to be made with an emphasis on guaranteeing that the advantages and weights inside the association are dispersed fairly. At the point when clashes emerge between the obligation to representatives and other hierarchical needs, Rawls' equity hypothesis can direct administration in going with decisions that maintain standards of decency and civil rights (?AH?N YARBA?, 2015). Management must place a high priority on open communication and involvement in order to address problems pertaining to the obligation to workers. This entails paying attention to what workers have to say, being open and honest about organisational choices, and, where necessary, incorporating workers in the decision-making process. Talking with employees promotes trust and a sense of shared accountability, which lowers the risk of disputes resulting from alleged disdain or neglect of workers' interests. Taking a long-term view is also very important. Even while certain choices can seem to go against what the workers want right now, a strategic approach takes into account how those choices will affect workers' overall happiness and well-being at work. Employee development, workplace safety, and a healthy organisational culture are all investments that pay off in the long run for the company and its workforce (Roseline. et al., 2020).
Recognising the relationship between organisational success and employee well-being is another important step in resolving conflicts between the obligation to workers and other organisational aims. Empirical evidence repeatedly demonstrates that contented and involved workers have a beneficial impact on output and creativity. Decisions that put employee welfare first can therefore be in line with the larger objectives of organisational success. Thus, it can be said that the board's liability in settling clashes between the duty to employees and other hierarchical needs requires a promise of equity, reasonableness, and open correspondence. By applying moral systems like Rawls' equity hypothesis and embracing a drawn-out viewpoint, the board can explore these struggles dependably, encouraging a positive hierarchical culture and adding to the prosperity and progress of the two workers and the association in general.

In the ever-changing world of business, disputes that put management's ethical obligations and values in jeopardy frequently occur. A methodical and moral strategy is needed to resolve these conflicts, and ethical decision-making models offer a formal framework for negotiating the intricacies of moral quandaries. The utilitarian model and Kant's categorical imperative are two well-known models that provide helpful assistance for making moral judgements that strike a balance between competing obligations.

Ethical Decision-Making in Management: Balancing Utilitarianism and Kant's Categorical Imperative

Utilitarian Model: Based on consequentialism, the utilitarian model states that an action's morality is judged by how much happiness or well-being it brings about in the aggregate. When there are disagreements over obligations to various stakeholders, including owners, workers, and the general public, this approach is especially pertinent. The utilitarian method is a tool that management may use to weigh the pros and disadvantages of every choice and choose the best course of action to maximise the welfare of all parties involved. For instance, the utilitarian model would demand an evaluation of the net impact on pleasure and welfare in the event of a choice that may enhance profits for shareholders at the expense of employee wellbeing. Each stakeholder group's benefits and drawbacks may be quantified so that management can make an educated choice. Be that as it may, a possible restriction of the utilitarian model lies in its test to foresee and gauge the drawn-out results of choices precisely. Moreover, there is a risk of ignoring the interests of minority partners chasing boosting generally speaking joy. The executives should practice wariness to guarantee that choices line up with moral standards and try not to excessively incline toward one gathering to the detriment of others.

Kant's Categorical Imperative: On the other hand, the categorical imperative, which embodies Kant's deontological approach, offers an alternative framework for moral judgement. According to Kant, a deed is ethically right if it can be applied to all situations without producing contradictions. The categorical imperative pushes management to think about whether the suggested course of action may be implemented as a universal moral norm in cases of conflict, especially when those disputes involve moral obligations to owners, workers, and the general public. For instance, Kant's categorical imperative forces management to consider whether it is possible to live in a society where decisions compromising the accuracy of financial reporting are made for the benefit of shareholders. If not, it is considered a morally wrong conduct. The commitment to ethical obligations and values is given priority in this approach, which offers a transparent and widely applicable norm for making decisions. Nonetheless, critics contend that the unmitigated basic might need adaptability in specific circumstances and could prompt moral absolutism. The unbending utilization of general standards could not completely catch the intricacies of certifiable moral quandaries. In this manner, the board needs to move toward the all-out basic with an insightful comprehension of the particular setting and subtleties of every circumstance.

Get Extra 10% OFF on your WhatsApp order!

use my discount

Integration and Application: Resolving disputes in an effective manner requires a comprehensive strategy that incorporates components from both models. Using the utilitarian model, management may first thoroughly analyse the effects of alternative courses of action, taking into account the perspectives of different stakeholders. The categorical imperative may therefore be used to make sure that the decision is consistent with universal ethical standards and is resistant to criticism in any situation. Making ethical decisions also necessitates a dedication to continual introspection and development. Establishing ethical frameworks and training initiatives will enable management and staff to successfully negotiate moral conundrums. Organisations are able to proactively resolve conflicts and strive towards sustainable, ethically sound business practises by cultivating a culture that appreciates ethical concerns.

So, overall, it can be concluded that the responsibilities of management in resolving conflicts between moral duties to owners, the public, and employees are complex and multi-layered. Moral systems, partner hypotheses, and dynamic models offer important apparatuses for exploring these intricacies. By taking on a coordinated methodology that considers the interests, everything being equal, the executives can make a maintainable and morally sound business climate. At last, an upright and very much educated administration is fundamental for accomplishing an agreeable harmony between moral obligations and business objectives, guaranteeing the drawn-out progress and moral remaining of the association. Furthermore, ethical decision-making models offer priceless resources for settling disputes involving managerial duties. The utilitarian approach supports the categorical imperative of Kant, which stresses general ethical norms, and helps assess implications and maximise wellbeing generally.

Consider the importance of designing the strategic architecture of a company to permit the company to prosper.

Creating a strong strategic architecture is essential for a company's long-term success in the dynamic commercial environment. This entails developing a framework that harmonises the objectives of the organisation with both its internal and external environments. One prime example of a business that has successfully used financial modelling and strategic architecture for long-term success is Rolls-Royce Holdings plc, a well-known international engineering conglomerate with its headquarters located in the UK.

Strategic Architecture and Financial Modelling: The Key to Rolls-Royce's Sustained Success

A company's strategic architecture acts as a fundamental road map that directs its success. It includes a methodical framework that synchronises organisational objectives with the dynamic internal and external environment. A well-known engineering corporation in the UK, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc, is a shining example of strategic architecture done right. Strategic architecture is fundamentally the integration of key components, including objectives, values, purpose, vision, and core skills (Hacklin, Björkdahl and Wallin, 2018). Encouraging a cohesive organisational identity and directing decision-making procedures depend heavily on this coherence. Rolls-Royce has positioned itself within the global aerospace and defence sector by adhering to the premise that effective strategies must be formulated by understanding industry dynamics, as highlighted by Michael Porter's Five Forces model. A crucial component of strategic architecture is the alignment of purpose and vision, which is shown in Rolls-Royce's dedication to leading the way in developing sustainable solutions for a safer and cleaner world. The Balanced Scorecard framework, which converts the company's goal into measurable operational indicators, supports this alignment. This framework is used by Rolls-Royce to track its success, which helps to keep everyone in the company engaged and working together. Essentially, strategic architecture creates a clear and intentional direction for a corporation by acting as the structural framework (Farida and Setiawan, 2022). Rolls-Royce views its strategic architecture as an adaptable framework that allows for ongoing assessment and modification rather than a rigid structure. Its dynamism guarantees that the business stays flexible in the face of changing global conditions, technical breakthroughs, and market dynamics, all of which greatly contribute to its long-term success in the aerospace sector (Teece, 2018).

Goals and objectives A company's strategic architecture must have alignment, as demonstrated by the congruence of Rolls-Royce Holdings plc's vision and goal. The goal of Rolls-Royce is "to pioneer the power that matters for our customers, for a cleaner, safer world," which demonstrates the company's dedication to both environmental sustainability and technical innovation. The company's mission statement establishes the overall goal of the organisation, highlighting the role that its goods and services play in making the world a safer and cleaner place. This fits in perfectly with the vision, which is the idealised future state that a business strives to reach (Our Strategy, n.d.) (Lazonick and Prencipe, 2004). Being a worldwide leader in creative and sustainable power solutions for the aerospace and defence industries is probably part of Rolls-Royce's ambition. The purpose and vision of the company must coincide in order to establish a unified brand and inspire workers to work towards shared goals. It gives decision-making, resource allocation, and strategic planning a clear path forward. This connection supports Rolls-Royce's competitive posture and long-term success by guaranteeing that the company's pursuit of innovation and engineering excellence is not only economically feasible but also positively impacts worldwide environmental and safety problems(Smith, 2013).

Financial modelling remains a foundation in the essential dynamic cycle, especially clear in the tasks of organizations like Rolls-Royce Property plc. This refined logical instrument includes the making of numerical portrayals that mimic the monetary presentation of an organization under different situations. For Rolls-Royce, working in the unique avionic business, monetary demonstrating is fundamental to expecting and exploring vulnerabilities, guaranteeing the arrangement of key choices with long-haul flourishing. Financial modelling is a strategic management technique that Rolls-Royce uses for scenario planning, which allows the company to explore a variety of possible scenarios. Scenario planning becomes critical in an industry characterised by quick technical breakthroughs, complicated geopolitical dynamics, and volatile markets. Rolls-Royce is able to evaluate the financial effects of different situations by simulating them and using financial modelling. By taking a proactive stance, the organisation may create backup plans and modify its strategic architecture to take advantage of emerging possibilities and reduce risks. The study of the company's value chain is one area in which financial modelling is valuable. Rolls-Royce seeks to preserve a competitive advantage and improve operational efficiency through the evaluation and improvement of internal processes(Rolls-Royce plc invests in knowledge-based design software, 2000). Financial models are used to forecast the financial results of supply chain optimisation, operational simplification, and investments in state-of-the-art technology. This methodical approach guarantees that strategic choices are in line with the goal and vision of the organisation as well as the implementation's financial viability. Risk management, one more basic aspect of key navigation, is braced by monetary demonstrating. Rolls-Royce takes part in quantitative risk analysis, utilizing procedures, for example, Monte Carlo reenactments to show different gambling situations. This incorporates international strains, store network disturbances, and changes in client inclinations. By measuring these dangers, Rolls-Royce can foster vigorous gamble relief methodologies, dispense assets, and protect its monetary well-being. Key advancement and speculation choices are likewise supported by monetary demonstrating. In the airplane business, where remaining at the bleeding edge of innovation is basic, Rolls-Royce evaluates expected interests in innovative work drives. Monetary models empower the organization to extend the monetary results of such speculations, guaranteeing they line up with the organization's essential objectives and add to the long-haul success. Financial modelling is essentially a forward-looking instrument that gives strategic decision-makers the ability to analyse, plan, and adjust to a changing company environment. The skilful application of financial modelling by Rolls-Royce demonstrates how this analytical method can become an essential part of a business's strategic architecture, directing choices that are both financially sound and visionary, eventually leading to long-term success and wealth(Smith, 2013).

Strategic Planning, Value Chain Analysis, and Innovation: Rolls-Royce's Blueprint for Aerospace Leadership

A crucial strategy for reducing uncertainty in the aerospace sector—a field recognised for its dynamic character and vulnerability to a wide range of outside influences—is scenario planning. One of the leading companies in this sector, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc, uses scenario planning skilfully to manage ambiguities and match its strategic strategy with sustained success. The aerospace sector is confronted with an array of concerns, encompassing swift technical progress, geopolitical unrest, and volatile markets. Planning scenarios entails methodically investigating a variety of possible future states in order to foresee obstacles and possibilities. Rolls-Royce uses this method to build a thorough picture of potential outcomes, which makes it feasible to design proactive tactics that support the company's goals. Rolls-Royce's scenario planning in the airplane business incorporates contemplations for mechanical disturbances. Given the speed of development in flying, the organization utilizes situations wanting to imagine different mechanical scenes. This includes expecting headways in impetus frameworks, materials, and man-made reasoning. By simulating different mechanical situations through situation arranging, Rolls-Royce positions itself to adjust and put decisively in regions that line up with its drawn-out vision, guaranteeing the persistent development of its items and administrations. The aerospace industry is inherently vulnerable to geopolitical risks due to its worldwide operations and reliance on cross-border cooperation. Scenario planning is a tool used by Rolls-Royce to anticipate future geopolitical situations, such as modifications to trade agreements, political unrest, or changes to regulatory frameworks. This makes it possible for the business to develop plans that take geopolitical risks into consideration, guaranteeing resilience in the face of uncertainty and preserving its success. Significant risks in the aerospace business are also represented by market variations, which include shifts in client preferences and economic situations. In order to account for these variations and adjust its strategic architecture, Rolls-Royce uses scenario planning. The corporation may retain financial stability and competitiveness by modifying its production, marketing, and investment plans based on demand fluctuations modelled into the models. Rolls-Royce's success in the aerospace sector may be partly ascribed to its capacity for scenario planning, which allows it to adjust to unforeseen circumstances. By using this strategy, the organisation can make sure that it is not unprepared for unanticipated occurrences and that its proactive tactics are in line with its long-term objectives. Scenario planning continues to be an essential tool for Rolls-Royce as the aerospace sector develops, enabling the business to operate in a dynamic environment and contribute to its long-term success(Smith, 2013).

A key tool for businesses looking to improve operational effectiveness is value chain analysis, which is deliberately used by Rolls-Royce Holdings plc, a prominent aerospace company, to streamline internal operations. According to Michael Porter's conceptualization, a company's operations are divided into discrete actions that go towards producing and delivering a good or service. This is known as the value chain. A thorough value chain analysis is necessary for Rolls-Royce, a brand known for innovation and precise engineering, to stay competitive. Rolls-Royce's worth chain starts with inbound operations, where the organization deals with the acquirement and transportation of unrefined substances. Through esteem chain examination, Rolls-Royce recognizes potential chances to upgrade its inventory network, guaranteeing a consistent progression of materials to help its accuracy designing cycles. This proficiency diminishes costs as well as upgrades the general quality and dependability of the results. The tasks period of the worth chain includes the change of unrefined substances into refined aviation answers for which Rolls-Royce is prestigious. Esteem chain examination here centres around smoothing out assembling processes, putting resources into state-of-the-art advances, and taking on accepted procedures in quality control. The point isn't just to create imaginative items but to do so in the absolute most proficient and financially savvy way. The following stage of the value chain, known as outbound logistics, involves shipping completed goods to consumers. In this regard, Rolls-Royce's value chain analysis guarantees prompt and dependable delivery, which enhances client happiness and loyalty. The aerospace sector, where timely delivery is critical, is one where this strategic emphasis on outbound logistics is especially important. Value chain analysis is also used to examine marketing and sales efforts. Rolls-Royce has customised its approaches to emphasise the accuracy, dependability, and environmental sustainability of its goods. The business increases the efficiency of reaching and interacting with its target audience by identifying the point in the value chain where these marketing initiatives have the most impact. Lastly, the assistance and backing period of the worth chain includes keeping up with associations with clients and guaranteeing the life span of Rolls-Royce's items. Esteem chain examination in this space permits the organization to give productive upkeep administrations, upgrading the general offer and consumer loyalty(Smith, 2013).

Additionally, Rolls-Royce is not an exception to the risks and uncertainties that beset other businesses. Financial modelling is a proactive technique for risk management that helps the business identify and reduce risks that might jeopardise its success. The business models a range of risk scenarios, such as shifts in customer preferences, supply chain interruptions, and geopolitical tensions, using Monte Carlo simulations and other quantitative techniques. This preserves Rolls-Royce's financial stability and long-term success by enabling it to create risk mitigation plans and use resources wisely. Strategic innovation and investment decisions assume a critical part in the achievement and manageability of organizations, and Rolls-Royce Possessions plc, a central member in the aeronautic trade, decisively uses these components to keep up with its strategic advantage. Rolls-Royce puts areas of strength in essential development, continually trying to push the limits of innovation inside the aviation area. The organization participates in innovative work (Research and Development) drives pointed toward spearheading new arrangements, from cutting-edge impetus frameworks to state-of-the-art materials. Key development isn't simply an optimistic pursuit; it is a determined interest from here on out. By remaining at the cutting edge of mechanical headways, Rolls-Royce guarantees its items stay sought after and its answers proceed to satisfy and surpass industry guidelines. Key to the organization's prosperity is its obligation to pursue informed venture choices. Monetary demonstrating is utilized to survey the likely returns and dangers related with different speculation choices. This scientific methodology permits Rolls-Royce to adjust its essential engineering to monetarily steady choices, guaranteeing that speculations add to the organization's drawn-out flourishing. Rolls-Royce's essential advancement and venture choices are supported by the acknowledgment that the airplane business is dynamic and dependent upon fast innovative development. Joseph Schumpeter's hypothesis of inventive obliteration is relevant here, stressing that development is an essential for supported thriving. By embracing key development and making designated speculations, Rolls-Royce adjusts to changing industry scenes as well as effectively shapes and impacts them. Beyond technology breakthroughs, the company's strategic innovation include innovation in business models. Rolls-Royce looks at new ways to provide value to its clients, such service-focused products and contracts based on performance. This strategy contributes to the company's long-term development by positioning it as a holistic solutions provider and matching the changing demands of the aerospace sector.

References

• M., Roseline, B., . M. and Taripanyeofori, C., 2020. Conflicts and Its Management In An Organisation: A Theoretical Review. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), [online] 10(05), pp.540–545. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.10.05.2020.p10162.
• Anon 2000. Rolls-Royce plc invests in knowledge-based design software. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, [online] 72(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat.2000.12772fab.015.
• Anon n.d. Our Strategy. [online] Available at: <https://www.rolls-royce.com/about/our-strategy.aspx#/>.
• Babalola, M.T., Stouten, J., Euwema, M.C. and Ovadje, F., 2016. The Relation Between Ethical Leadership and Workplace Conflicts: The Mediating Role of Employee Resolution Efficacy. Journal of Management, [online] 44(5), pp.2037–2063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638163.
• Coelho, P.R.P., McClure, J.E. and Spry, J.A., 2003. The Social Responsibility of Corporate Management: A Classical Critique. American Journal of Business, [online] 18(1), pp.15–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/19355181200300001.
• Farida, I. and Setiawan, D., 2022. Business Strategies and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Performance and Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, [online] 8(3), p.163. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030163.
• Feri, S., 2021. The Effect of Diversity towards Team Conflict and How Emotional Intelligence Role as Moderating Variable in Improving Team Performance: A Theoretical Study. Journal of Economics, Finance And Management Studies, [online] 04(11). https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v4-i11-33.
• Hacklin, F., Björkdahl, J. and Wallin, M.W., 2018. Strategies for business model innovation: How firms reel in migrating value. Long Range Planning, [online] 51(1), pp.82–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.009.
• Huhtala, M., Fadjukoff, P. and Kroger, J., 2020. Managers as Moral Leaders: Moral Identity Processes in the Context of Work. Journal of Business Ethics, [online] 172(4), pp.639–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04500-w.
• Lazonick, W. and Prencipe, A., 2004. The Governance of Innovation: The Case of Rolls-Royce plc. Corporate Governance and Firm Organization, [online] pp.246–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269761.003.0012.
• McCahery, J.A. and Vermeulen, E.P.M., 2009. Conflict Resolution and the Role of Corporate Law Courts: An Empirical Study. SSRN Electronic Journal. [online] https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1448192.
• Nihlén Fahlquist, J., 2021. The moral responsibility of governments and individuals in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, [online] 49(7), pp.815–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494821990250.
• R.L., M., 2021. Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility in India: empirical investigation of an emerging market. Review of International Business and Strategy, [online] 31(4), pp.540–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/ribs-07-2020-0077.
• ?AH?N YARBA?, P., 2015. Role of Managers in Solving Conflicts in the Organizations. Do?u? Üniversitesi Dergisi, [online] 1(16), pp.109–120. https://doi.org/10.31671/dogus.2018.64.
• Smith, D.J., 2013. Power-by-the-hour: the role of technology in reshaping business strategy at Rolls-Royce. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, [online] 25(8), pp.987–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.823147.
• Teece, D.J., 2018. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, [online] 51(1), pp.40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007.