International Business Topic CSR Sample

Introduction To International Business Topic CSR

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is crucial in increasing organisational competitiveness by incorporating ethically as well as socially responsible behaviours into organisational strategies (Newman et al., 2020). For starters, CSR helps to promote a favourable company image by instilling faith in clients, investors, and additional partners. As consumers of today prioritise ecological and ethical factors in what they buy, a firm considered as socially conscious is more inclined to draw in and retain customers (Emmert, 2021). Furthermore, CSR projects may boost staff happiness and efficiency. Companies that practise social responsibility tend to find and keep talented workers, since consumers frequently prefer philanthropic environments. Tackling ESG (environmental, social, and governance) concerns strategically additionally assures compliance with laws yet protects businesses from future publicity catastrophes (‌ Rio, 2023). Establishing a trustworthy and accountable brand is critical for long-term competitiveness in a time where data travels quickly through the internet. 

This is the topic of concern here and CSR and its relation to organisational competitiveness will be evaluated in the sections that will follow the report. The report here has initially provided a background of the theme named CSR and its role on organisational competitiveness. The preview attached in the above part  explains the role of CSR and its link to competitiveness among organisations. Following this, the report here will follow a thorough investigative approach to understand the pre published literature on the theme as mentioned above. The literature review will be engaging in discussing the pre-published data and scholarly information that has either spoken about CSR’s link to competitiveness in general and also pertains to a variety of organisations. Then, the report will discuss the methodological section in which the methods that have been followed to design and construct the report will be scrutinised. This section will also continue to pursue the data analytical methods by which the data analysis and investigation methods are evaluated. Following this, the report here will outline findings of the research that has been presented and accessed in all the previous sections. Following this, the report will then ultimately summarise the findings and results in the concluding section which in turn will be followed by a series of relevant recommendations that are consistent with the findings. 

The aims of this report are to: 

1.Identify the importance of corporate social responsibility among global firms and evaluate theories related to CSR.

2. To determine the primary hurdles in adopting corporate social responsibility (CSR) procedures and to emphasise the link among CSR activities and organisational competitiveness.
3. To examine one of the CSR reports supplied to determine the primary techniques used by John Lewis Partnership to handle its primary customers, resulting in organisational competitiveness. 

The objectives of this report following the aims are:

The purpose of the following essay is to investigate the significance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in international organisations, with an emphasis on its influence on credibility, confidence among stakeholders, and longevity. It also examines the problems associated with executing CSR and its relationship to enhanced productivity, as well as the client leadership strategies used by John Lewis Partnership.

Literature Review 

Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility Among Global Firms

In their paper, Bucura et al., (2019), define CSR on the basis of "the procedures by which leaders within an organisation consider regarding and addressing connections with participants as well as their respective positions in connection to the prevalent advantageous position, together with their behavioural mindset with respect to the fulfilment and accomplishment of these positions and connections" (Bucura et al., 2019). The findings presented in the Romanian research indicate that a holistic approach to business reporting is required, since major corporations establish CSR patterns. CSR is an invaluable instrument for any organisation that wishes to be recognised (Bucura et al., 2019). Regardless of whether it is not a required device, confusion of the concept and its omission may have an impact on the perceived worth and accomplishment of upcoming initiatives for any sort of organisation. The contributors emphasise the Romanian environment in which enterprises must carry out and improve corporate social responsibility (CSR) procedures in their industrial segments (Bucura et al., 2019). 

The paper by Prasad, (2020), investigates corporate social responsibility and deduces that it is a requirement for every organisation to adhere to in order to operate as an excellent business accountable citizen, not only through adhering to every regulation but also by carrying out its operations in production and marketing in a way that will assist everybody to prevent detrimental environment that can cause contamination or fatigue finite global resources. Professional social obligation and business ethics play critical roles in organisations and provide significant benefits (Prasad, 2020).  CSR aids in the improvement of public image since customers make shopping or utilising decisions while considering a business's public reputation. Corporate social responsibility also reduces total manufacturing costs and facilitates various easy improvements such as adhering to company principles. Employee fulfilment, which Prasad, (2020) feels CSR delivers, is strong in such organisations and results in total client fulfilment, which is advantageous to the company as a whole.

The Triple Bottom Line (TBL) hypothesis as discussed in the paper by ‌Brin and Nehme, (2019), is a long-term sustainability paradigm that evaluates a company's achievements across three linked parameters: economic, social, and environmental. It extends further the typical emphasis on monetary benefits by emphasising the significance for individuals (social) and the natural world (environment) in addition to revenues (economic). According to TBL, an effective company should not just provide financial benefits but also constructively and positively impact the community while minimising adverse environmental effects. TBL, which was developed by John Elkington, urges firms to take an integrated strategy, balancing earnings with charitable giving and dedication to the environment, creating a long-term sustainable growth along with ethical business behaviour (‌Brin and Nehme, 2019).

The Stakeholder Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as described in the study by ‌Brin and Nehme, (2019), is an approach that emphasises the value of taking into account the objectives and effects of interested parties other than shareholders. This idea, originated with R. Edward Freeman, proposes that organisations ought to consider the needs and worries of employees, consumers, providers, neighbourhoods, and their surroundings in addition to stockholders (‌Brin and Nehme, 2019). Organisations may improve their standing among consumers, develop confidence, and make contributions to social prosperity through integrating stakeholder viewpoints into decisions they make. This comprehensive strategy is consistent with the notion that long-term company success is inextricably linked to the happiness of the community at large. Organisations may get a more comprehensive knowledge of CSR by cultivating mutually beneficial connections while positively influencing the community while attaining commercial objectives.

Primary Hurdles in Adopting Corporate Social Responsibility

According to the research provided by Liopa et al., (2023), there are several barriers to CSR adoption, particularly monetary, lack of federal backing, the government, and insufficient interaction with stakeholders. The document here discloses that financial, social, and ecological operations and dangers must be publicly disclosed in order to promote openness and public perception about a corporation. Considering the socioeconomic and epidemiological crises, Greek enterprise that has been featured in this paper, has been subjected to severe socio-economic distortions in the past few years. 

As highlighted in the research by Koskela-Huotari, (2018), the main barrier in implementing corporate social responsibility is the substantial expense of CSR. Due to tight requirements, a dearth of congruence, or inadequate motivation for being socially conscious habits, legislation and regulations may impede the adoption of CSR. In addition, issues in shifting actors' mindsets from conventional procedures (traditional ways) of accomplishing things to new methods may make incorporating CSR difficult. 

Cultural variation or diversification might emerge as an issue since CSR tactics may not always coincide with varied social values and customs and especially religion (‌Farooq et al., 2019). Coordination of many viewpoints and standards necessitates a complex approach. Furthermore, the lack of established standards for analysing CSR impacts provides a barrier. Measuring and measuring the environmental and social advantages remains inaccurate, rendering it difficult for organisations to prove real outcomes and successfully explain their CSR accomplishments.

Link among CSR Activities and Organisational Competitiveness

According to Nguyen, (2022), there is a favourable relationship between the implementation of CSR and supplier competition. However, the investigation pointed to previously published materials that showed that organisations with limited CSR initiatives performed better financially. However, better financial performance does not guarantee viable and loyal customers over time in the absence of CSR. 

Singh and Misra, (2021), suggest that CSR impacts organisational performance when directed towards other interested parties. Managerial opinions concerning CSR and social responsibility efforts of a corporation have been demonstrated to be highly connected to the company's credibility, fundamental principles, and general organisational success. According to survey data followed in this paper by (Singh and Misra, 2021), CSR focused towards communities and consumers substantially influenced the competitiveness of organisations. Managers' attitudes about CSR towards workers were shown to have no noteworthy direct association with organisational effectiveness. One of the research's notable findings, and contradictory to Singh, K., and Misra's hypothesis was the negative and substantial effect of CSR and business image on the connection between CSR and organisational performance. 

Get Extra 10% OFF on your WhatsApp order!

use my discount

CSR Implementation By John Lewis Partnership & Organisational Competitiveness 

According to their detailed performance paper, The John Lewis Partnership displays strong Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policies. The report, which is dedicated to environmentally conscious companies, highlights activities targeting the effects on the environment, ethical procurement, and societal well-being. The John Lewis Partnership prioritises reducing carbon emissions, environmentally friendly ideas, and responsible manufacturing practices. The business's commitment to employee happiness is visible in programmes that promote inclusivity, diversity, and well-being. In addition, involvement in community projects demonstrates their dedication to social improvement (johnlewispartnership.co.uk, 2022). By clearly disclosing accomplishments, John Lewis Partnership establishes a praiseworthy CSR standard, integrating company success with ethical and environmental policies. 

The John Lewis Partnership promotes its "Working in Partnership for a Happier World" objective by committing to a more compassionate, fairer society which stands as a basic aim for CSR practices (johnlewispartnership.co.uk, 2023). This in turn helps JLP to create a brand image of competitiveness in the industry. The organisation prioritises paying attention to and comprehending the problems of Partners, consumers, vendors, and populations, which is based on solid connections. Accepting the duty of climate change mitigation, the firm has put in place a comprehensive ecological strategy and "Our Plan for Nature," which honours creator Spedan Lewis' ecological vision (johnlewispartnership.co.uk, 2023). By linking business operations with a 1.5°C climate objective, the corporation not only respects conscientious ideals, but also assures organisational competitiveness using a complete plan that connects with a larger context of societal and environmental responsibility, or CSR (johnlewispartnership.co.uk, 2023).

Methodology 

Exploration and comprehension of the intricacies of human behaviour and societal trends are central to qualitative research methods (Tenny et al., 2022). To collect extensive, complex data, scientists use thorough, unrestricted approaches such as focus groups, interviews, and observer interviews. This method prioritises background and personal experiences, providing for a more in-depth understanding of the issue under consideration (‌Hall and Harvey, 2018). Analysis of information frequently entails classifying and categorizing data to uncover structures, concepts, and interpretations. The credibility of the research is increased by meticulous reflexivity, in which researchers identify their individual biases. Finally, qualitative research offers a comprehensive knowledge of human processes, providing important insights for the fields of social science and further studies (Aspers and Corte, 2019).

The necessity for comprehensive investigation as well as awareness of complicated social issues drove the use of a qualitative technique for the current study endeavour on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its influence on organisational competitiveness. Qualitative research enables a more detailed examination of the complex links involving CSR activities and organisational competitiveness (Roy and Jain, 2023). In contrast to statistical or quantitative techniques, qualitative research excels in understanding the complexity and dimension of individual encounters, perspectives, and motives. In the overall setting of CSR, which has complex social and ethical components, qualitative approaches like screenings, empirical research, and topic analysis provide a comprehensive understanding of the issue. Qualitative research may provide important insights into key stakeholders' opinions, principles, and behaviours, such as staff members, customers, and administrators (‌Family health international, 2017). A qualitative technique also provides for flexibility and adaptation during the analysis procedure, allowing for the investigation of novel topics and unanticipated results (Busetto et al., 2020). A qualitative technique is appropriate for probing into the complexities and variances in those concepts, since academic analysis has already revealed different viewpoints on CSR. This study will use qualitative methodologies to investigate the complexities of CSR adoption, the constraints that organisations confront, and the concrete and subjective implications on competition. The study employs a qualitative approach to provide sophisticated and context-dependent observations that could influence theorists as well as practitioners in the field of CSR and organisational strategy.

The interpretivism research approach is concerned with comprehending personal significance in social environments (Yousafzai, 2023). It utilises qualitative approaches such as interviews as well as observations, highlighting the role of the researcher in generating perceptions (Yousafzai, 2023). Interpretivism, which rejects neutrality, dives into the complexities of human situations, respecting different views and cultural subtleties for a deeper comprehension of social processes (‌Tanweer et al., 2021). Because of the complexities of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its influence on organisational competitiveness, an interpretivist technique was used for this investigation. Interpretivism is well-suited to investigating the subjective and culturally created semantics assigned to CSR initiatives by partners such as workers, consumers, and business. Interpretivism provides for a profound understanding of multiple viewpoints and local complexities around the implementation of CSR by adopting qualitative methodologies such as conversations along with material analysis (Sameen et al., 2019). This technique is consistent to reveal the intricacies of the execution of CSR, organisational obstacles, and perceived relationships to competition.

The data analysis that will be followed here will be based on the investigation of John Lewis Partnership's stakeholders and the three techniques by which the company manages its stakeholders. Mainly the secondary data analysis will be followed here as the data that has been presented and published will be used here. The JLP data and the literature review section has also followed the secondary research methods by taking information from the early-published data. Consumers who participate in retail actions, workers who help ensure the company's achievement, vendors who provide items, and towns and cities touched by JLP's activities are all stakeholders for John Lewis Partnership (JLP). The shareholders are interested in the business's economic performance, and government departments check compliance. Furthermore, JLP's devotion to sustainable development involves a larger social stakeholder community focused on caring for the environment (johnlewispartnership.co.uk, 2022). JLP's commitment to comprehensive social responsibility as a whole is shown in this multidimensional customer approach.

1) Target defining for Stakeholder Engagement: John Lewis Partnership takes an active strategy by defining particular objectives for supplies such as polyester yarn, leather, and MMCF (johnlewispartnership.co.uk, 2022). The organisation demonstrates its dedication to environmentally friendly procedures by developing specific goals. This strategy involves stakeholders from all over, resulting in a clear framework for action. The creation of guidelines and instructional tools demonstrates the company's commitment to teaching and involves stakeholders in the achievement of sustainable goals. The strategy and tracking system emphasise accountability while encouraging cooperation and trust.

2) Transparent Changeover Planning for zero percent Goals: The need of developing a transparent transition plan to reach science-based net-zero goals is critical to overseeing the demands of stakeholders. The Partnership handles issues while also inviting stakeholder engagement by clearly outlining the activities it plans to undertake. Clarity in the shift programme increases confidence and matches the objectives of many stakeholders with sustainable development goals, reducing uncertainty and promoting an easier shift to a net-zero future (johnlewispartnership.co.uk, 2022).

3) Using the Responsible Commodities Facility to Have a Scalable Impact: The Responsible Commodities Facility is an innovative and scalable paradigm for sustainable behaviours. The strategy exemplifies an effective investment that benefits not just ecology but also employers and producers. By releasing more funds, the Partnership demonstrates its commitment to demonstrating the feasibility of environmentally friendly techniques as a profitable investment. This strategy balances financial goals with social and ecological aims, resulting in a model that might be duplicated throughout sectors. It demonstrates the organisation's awareness of how the economy, society, and the environment are intertwined in stakeholder management.

The study methodology's shortcomings include the possibility of prejudice in qualitative data analysis due to subjective opinions. Furthermore, relying on previously published research may leave out new changes, restricting the investigation's accuracy and full analysis of changing approaches to CSR and organisational competitiveness (‌Longe, 2020).

Research & Findings 

The information supplied is pertinent to the introduction's goals and objectives. The purpose of this report is to determine the growing significance of CSR, among international companies, assess CSR concepts, detect the biggest obstacles to implementing CSR procedures, emphasise the link between CSR activities and organisational productivity, and look at CSR implementation by John Lewis Partnership. The survey of literature evaluates the relevance of CSR, the barriers to its adoption, and its relationship to organisational competitiveness. Furthermore, the methodology section describes the strategy taken to evaluate the impact of CSR on organisational competitiveness, with particular focus on John Lewis Partnership's ethical business practices.

This study depends on secondary sources and adopts a qualitative research technique. Statistical statistics are regarded unimportant since the emphasis is on thorough investigation and decoding of the complexity of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its influence on organisational competitiveness rather than statistical analysis. The offered information effectively summarises, discusses, and evaluates the pertinent facts. The overview in writing goes into the significance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), the barriers to its adoption, and its relationship to organisational growth, referencing several research. The part on methodology describes the qualitative technique taken to study CSR's effect, with a focus on the John Lewis Partnership. In summary, the material encompasses and addresses the important components of CSR and organisational competitiveness as indicated in the objectives and goals.

The text gives a thorough review of the patterns and major factors associated with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and organisational competitiveness. Patterns in implementing CSR obstacles, such as monetary obstacles and cultural differences, are investigated. The study in literature examines perspectives on the value of CSR, including topics such as reputation, cost reductions in production, and stakeholder participation. The connections between CSR efforts and organisational competitiveness are examined, as well as the implications for supplier competition and profitability. John Lewis Partnership's CSR implementation reveals discernible trends regarding green efforts, satisfaction among workers, and civic engagement. 

The information and citations supplied in the text typically support the assertions stated in the text. Bucura et al. (2019), Prasad (2020), Brin and Nehme (2019), Liopa et al. (2023), Koskela-Huotari (2018), Nguyen (2022), and Singh and Misra (2021) all translate to a comprehensive exploration of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and its significance, difficulties, and consequences for organisational competitiveness. The book emphasises the importance of CSR in improving the reputation of an organisation, lowering manufacturing costs, and increasing worker and consumer satisfaction. To emphasise the multifaceted dimensions of CSR, it provides key ideas for example the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) hypothesis and Stakeholder Theory. Furthermore, the results of the study support the highlighted challenges to CSR the adoption process, such as budgetary limits, legal concerns, and cultural differences. The John Lewis Partnership is highlighted as an example of excellent implementation of CSR, with corporate processes aligned with environmental and ethical concerns. The claims are sufficiently contextualised and backed up by the research cited, giving rise to an accurate depiction of CSR and its consequences for corporate competitiveness.

The investigation's outcomes reported here correspond with and corroborate the ideas, theories, and conceptions generated from the scientific review. Bucura et al. (2019) and Prasad (2020) emphasise the relevance of CSR in improving the public's perception of an organisation and recognition. These ideas are consistent with the Stakeholder Theory proposed by Brin and Nehme (2019), which argues for taking into account the requirements for parties other than shareholders. Brin and Nehme (2019) address the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) concept, which aligns with Prasad's (2020) notion that CSR extends beyond simply conformity to rules, emphasising the financial, social, and ecological aspects of organisational performance. The barriers to CSR adoption mentioned by Liopa et al. (2023) and Koskela-Huotari (2018) replicate the obstacles created by regulatory limits and the significant expenses of embracing corporate social responsibility that are addressed in the literature. Farooq et al. (2019) emphasise cultural variances that support the idea that CSR techniques might not always be consistent with varied social norms. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and organisational competitiveness, as investigated by Nguyen (2022) and Singh and Misra (2021), illustrates the scholarship's contradictory conclusions. While Nguyen argues that CSR and supplier competitiveness have a positive association, Singh and Misra emphasise the intricate connection between CSR, corporate image, and organisational success. The John Lewis Partnership's adoption of CSR is consistent with the literature's dedication to a thorough CSR strategies explanation that combine environmental awareness, ethical purchasing, and a healthier society to improve organisational productivity, as indicated by the TBL theory and Stakeholder Theory. In general, the study findings are well-founded and backed by the literature assessment, resulting in a comprehensive grasp of CSR and its consequences for organisational performance.

Conclusion and Recommendations 

Conclusion 

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is an important component of improving business competitiveness by incorporating moral as well as social accountable behaviours into strategy. It improves credibility, client retention, satisfaction with staff, and compliance with social, governance, and environmental problems. Organisations, however, encounter problems in implementing CSR, such as budgetary restrictions, legal obstacles, and various cultures. The comprehensive character of CSR, which involves many different parties and addresses complicated challenges, complicates execution. The association between CSR efforts and organisational competitiveness is complicated, with evidence pointing to both positive and conflicting effects. Some studies emphasise CSR's beneficial influence on rivalry among suppliers and general organisational success, whilst others emphasise the complicated interplay between CSR, brand perception, and productivity. The study employed qualitative investigation and interpretivism to investigate the intricacies of CSR and its impact on organisational viability. The John Lewis Partnership investigation exemplifies effective CSR implementation by integrating business activities into ecological and moral considerations. Implementing CSR is an essential requirement for organisations to handle the difficulties of the present economic scenery, not only a moral duty. These results add to the increasing body of information on CSR while offering information for researchers and those seeking to comprehend and implement environmentally and ethically responsible corporate behaviour. In an economy where company activities are scrutinised, corporate social responsibility emerges as a vital motivator for sustained profitability and prosperity.

Recommendations

1) Deployment of Combined CSR Strategies: Organisations should implement incorporated social responsibility (CSR) plans that are consistent with their basic principles, company procedures, and customer demands (Wirba, 2023). The Triple Bottom Line (TBL) hypothesis and Stakeholder Theory give frameworks for an extensive strategy that considers environmental, social, and economic variables. This holistic viewpoint improves the business's overall edge.

2) Open Information and Stakeholder Participation: It is critical to communicate openly about CSR activities (Mitra et al., 2018). Clients, workers, suppliers, and the public should all be personally involved by businesses. Organisations may create trust, improve image and make certain CSR activities resonate favourably with varied viewers by creating straightforward interaction avenues and involve consumers in decisions that are made (Mitra et al., 2018).

3) Cultural Competence in CSR Practices: Recognising cultural differences is critical in conducting CSR efforts, particularly in a global environment (Eriksson et al., 2019). Organisations should modify their CSR operations to reflect different cultural and religious norms and conventions. Cultural awareness ensures that CSR activities are popular, reducing the probability of retaliation while maximizing beneficial effect in different cultural environments.

4) Staff Development and Health Investment: Companies should prioritise staff development programmes, encourage equality and acceptance, and improve overall employee satisfaction (Chang et al., 2021). Employee satisfaction-focused CSR efforts contribute to a good working atmosphere, attract and hold onto talent, and eventually increase workplace competitiveness.

5) Flexibility and Development in CSR Strategies: Recognising the changing dynamics of the CSR sector, organisations must stay adaptive and receptive to creativity. Reexamining CSR plans on occasion, remaining educated about developing worries, and adopting imaginative approaches help organisations stay in front of public demands and preserve their market position.

6) Strategic CSR Reporting: Organisations should invest in innovative CSR reporting that extends beyond regulatory compliance (Hlioui and Yousfi, 2022). Companies may demonstrate their dedication to ethical company conduct by emphasising the effect of CSR on public image, cost savings, and customer happiness. Strategic assessment helps to build a reliable reputation for a company.

7) Implement the John Lewis Partnership's CSR Policies: Businesses might be inspired by the John Lewis Partnership's social responsibility policies. JLP exhibits a complete CSR approach connected with the TBL theory and Stakeholder Theory by prioritising sustainable development, ethical purchasing, and civic engagement. Adopting comparable principles may assist organisations succeed and compete.

In the end, these ideas emphasize the need of approaching CSR in a tactical, combined, and socially appropriate manner. Organisations may have a beneficial influence on the community while improving their general performance by engaging with those involved, prioritising the well-being of staff, and adjusting to changing events.

References 

• Aspers, P. and Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research? Qualitative Sociology, [online] 42(2), pp.139–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7.
• ‌Brin, P. and Nehme, M. (2019). CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: ANALYSIS OF THEORIES AND MODELS. Eureka: Social and Humanities, [online] 5, pp.22–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2019.001007.
• Bucura, M. et al. (2019). The Importance Of Corporate Social Responsibility among Organizations in the Centre Development Region of Romania. 
• Busetto, L., Wick, W. and Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, [online] 2(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z.
• Chang, C. hsuan , Lin, W.W., Tsai, W.H., Wang, W.L. and Huang, C.T. (2021). Employee Satisfaction, Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Sustainability, [online] 13(18), pp.9996–9996. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13189996.
• Emmert, A. (2021). The rise of the eco-friendly consumer. [online] Strategy+business. Available at: https://www.strategy-business.com/article/The-rise-of-the-eco-friendly-consumer [Accessed 19 Dec. 2023].
• Eriksson, D., Mccollum, P. and Jönköping, O. (2019). The Cultural Influence on CSR. [online] Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1322296/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
• ‌Family health international (2017). Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide Module 1. [online] pp.1–12. Available at: https://course.ccs.neu.edu/is4800sp12/resources/qualmethods.pdf.
• ‌Farooq, Q., Hao, Y. and Li, X. (2019). Understanding corporate social responsibility with cross?cultural differences: A deeper look at religiosity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, [online] 26(4), pp.965–971. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1736.
• ‌Hall, R.C.W. and Harvey, L. (2018). Qualitative research provides insights into the experiences and perspectives of people with spinal cord injuries and those involved in their care. Spinal Cord, [online] 56(6), pp.527–527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-018-0161-4.
• Hlioui, Z. and Yousfi, O. (2022). CSR and Innovation: Two Sides of the Same Coin. IntechOpen eBooks. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94344.
• johnlewispartnership.co.uk (2022). Ethics & Sustainability Report 2022/23 WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP FOR A HAPPIER WORLD 2 Ethics &. [online] Available at: https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/content/dam/cws/pdfs/Juniper/ethics-and-sustainability/PR2023/Ethics-and-Sustainability-Report-2022_23.pdf.
• johnlewispartnership.co.uk (2023). E N V I R O N M E N T Designing with circularity in mind and eradicating waste Guaranteeing a fair deal for producers and supporting them to farm with nature. [online] Available at: https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/content/dam/cws/pdfs/Juniper/ethics-and-sustainability/PR2023/Ethics-and-Sustainability-Report-2022-23-strategy-page.pdf.
• Koskela-Huotari, K. (2018). Challenges in Implementation of CSR. [online] Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1223476/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
• Liopa, M., Geitona, M. and Latsou, D. (2023). Factors Affecting the Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Health Technology Industry in Greece. Cureus. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39946.
• ‌Longe, B. (2020). Primary vs Secondary Data:15 Key Differences & Similarities. [online] Formplus. Available at: https://www.formpl.us/blog/primary-secondary-data [Accessed 19 Dec. 2023].
• Mitra, N., Akhtar, A. and Gupta, A.D. (2018). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility in the post mandate period: Evidence from India. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, [online] 3(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0033-4.
• Newman, C., Rand, J., Tarp, F. and Trifkovic, N. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility in a Competitive Business Environment. The Journal of Development Studies. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.1080//00220388.2019.1694144.
• Nguyen, M.V. (2022). Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility implementation and contractor competitiveness | Emerald Insight. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, [online] ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), p.-. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108//ECAM.
• Prasad, P. (2020). The Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics. [online] ResearchGate. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343481481_The_Importance_of_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_and_Business_Ethics [Accessed 19 Dec. 2023].
• ‌Rio (2023). What is ESG and what is an ESG strategy? | Rio ESG. [online] Www.rio.ai. Available at: https://www.rio.ai/blog/what-is-esg [Accessed 19 Dec. 2023].
• Roy, R. and Jain, N. (2023). IdeaScale. [online] IdeaScale. Available at: https://ideascale.com/blog/what-is-qualitative-research/ [Accessed 19 Dec. 2023].
• Sameen, S., Rashid, Y., Rashid , A. and Waseem, A. (2019). Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers - Yasir Rashid, Ammar Rashid, Muhammad Akib Warraich, Sana Sameen Sabir, Ansar Waseem, 2019. [online] International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1609406919862424  [Accessed 19 Dec. 2023].
• Singh, K. and Misra, M. (2021). Linking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Organizational Performance: the moderating effect of corporate reputation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, [online] 27(1), pp.100139–100139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.100139.
• ‌Tanweer, A., Gade, E.K., Krafft, P.M. and Dreier, S.K. (2021). Why the Data Revolution Needs Qualitative Methods. Harvard Data Science Review. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.eee0b0da.
• Tenny, S., Brannan, J.M. and Brannan, G.D. (2022). Qualitative Study. [online] Nih.gov. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/ [Accessed 19 Dec. 2023].
• Wirba, A.V. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of Government in promoting CSR. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01185-0.
• Yousafzai, A. (2023). Interpretivism: The Interpretivist Research Paradigm. [online] ZONE OF EDUCATION. Available at: https://zonofeducation.com/interpretivism/ [Accessed 19 Dec. 2023].