17 Pages
4202 Words
Introduction of Financial Management For Global Decision Makers Assignment
The report addresses the concerns faced by the writers of a company known as Smith construction limited. The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the mentioned company using an appropriate range of financial ratios that will help in calculating the areas of concern related to the change in performance. It might have occurred after the company has been incorporated. It also discusses the findings related to the possible areas of misappropriation and how internal control affects the component of the company (Pakurár,et al. 2019).
Searching for comprehensive assignment services in the UK? New Assignment Help is your one-stop solution. Our experienced team caters to all your academic needs with precision and expertise.
Part One – Ratio Analysis
Liquidity ratios
Smith Construction Ltd |
Year |
Current ratio |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Current asset |
(Current Assets /Current Liabilities) |
£ 110,000.00 |
1.57 |
0.48 |
Current liability |
£ 70,000.00 |
2020 |
Current asset |
£ 180,000.00 |
1.09 |
Current liability |
£ 165,000.00 |
2019 |
Current asset |
£ 180,000.00 |
1.09 |
0.00 |
Current liability |
£ 165,000.00 |
2018 |
Current asset |
£ 180,000.00 |
1.09 |
0.00 |
Current liability |
£ 165,000.00 |
Year |
Net working capital |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
current assets- current liabilities |
current assets- current liabilities/ total assets |
£ 40,000.00 |
0.67 |
0.42 |
Total Assets |
£ 60,000.00 |
2020 |
current assets- current liabilities |
£ 15,000.00 |
0.25 |
Total Assets |
£ 60,000.00 |
2019 |
current assets- current liabilities |
£ 15,000.00 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
Total Assets |
£ 60,000.00 |
2018 |
current assets- current liabilities |
£ 15,000.00 |
0.25 |
0.00 |
Total Assets |
£ 60,000.00 |
Year |
Cash Ratio |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash and Cash Equivalents/ Current Liabilities |
£ 927,000.00 |
13.24 |
7.76 |
Current Liability |
£ 70,000.00 |
2020 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
£ 904,000.00 |
5.48 |
Current Liability |
£ 165,000.00 |
2019 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
£ 1,082,000.00 |
6.56 |
-1.08 |
Current Liability |
£ 165,000.00 |
2018 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
£ 936,000.00 |
5.67 |
0.88 |
Current Liability |
£ 165,000.00 |
Table 1: Liquidity ratios
(Source: Created by learner)
Analysis: The liquidity ratio shows the ability of a company to pay off its short-term obligations and the calculation of its margin of safety through the current ratio equation and operating cash flow. The liquidity ratio of smith construction private limited shows that the company has been making exact returns over the past 3 years but they have been facing issues due to the decision-making process and the appointment of a new financial advisor James Blond.
Profitability ratios
Smith Construction Ltd |
Year |
Net Profit Ratio |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Net Profit |
(Net Profit/Sales)*100 |
£ 642,000.00 |
13.62% |
-2.53% |
Sales |
£ 4,714,000.00 |
2020 |
Net Profit |
£ 631,000.00 |
16.15% |
Sales |
£ 3,908,000.00 |
2019 |
Net Profit |
£ 339,000.00 |
9.91% |
6.24% |
Sales |
£ 3,422,000.00 |
2018 |
Net Profit |
£ 370,000.00 |
12.02% |
-2.12% |
Sales |
£ 3,077,000.00 |
2017 |
Net Profit |
£ 412,000.00 |
15.05% |
-3.02% |
Sales |
£ 2,737,600.00 |
Year |
Gross Profit Ratio |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Gross Profit |
(Gross Profit/Sales)*100 |
£ 3,019,000.00 |
64.04% |
0.76% |
Sales |
£ 4,714,000.00 |
2020 |
Gross Profit |
£ 2,473,000.00 |
63.28% |
Sales |
£ 3,908,000.00 |
2019 |
Gross Profit |
£ 2,088,000.00 |
61.02% |
2.26% |
Sales |
£ 3,422,000.00 |
2018 |
Gross Profit |
£ 1,880,000.00 |
61.10% |
-0.08% |
Sales |
£ 3,077,000.00 |
2017 |
Gross Profit |
£ 1,128,000.00 |
41.20% |
19.89% |
Sales |
£ 2,737,600.00 |
Year |
Return on Assets |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Net Profit |
(Net Profit /Total Assets)*100 |
£ 642,000.00 |
321.00% |
314.68% |
Total Assets |
£ 200,000.00 |
2020 |
Net Profit |
£ 631,000.00 |
6.32% |
Total Assets |
£ 9,992,000.00 |
2019 |
Net Profit |
£ 339,000.00 |
3.64% |
2.68% |
Total Assets |
£ 9,325,000.00 |
2018 |
Net Profit |
£ 370,000.00 |
4.06% |
-0.43% |
Total Assets |
£ 9,112,000.00 |
2017 |
Net Profit |
£ 412,000.00 |
6.96% |
-2.90% |
Total Assets |
£ 5,922,800.00 |
Year |
Return on Equity |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Net Profit |
(Net Profit / Equity)*100 |
£ 642,000.00 |
17.59% |
-1.23% |
Equity |
£ 3,649,000.00 |
2020 |
Net Profit |
£ 631,000.00 |
18.82% |
Equity |
£ 3,353,000.00 |
2019 |
Net Profit |
£ 339,000.00 |
10.33% |
8.49% |
Equity |
£ 3,281,000.00 |
2018 |
Net Profit |
£ 370,000.00 |
15.23% |
-4.89% |
Equity |
£ 2,430,000.00 |
2017 |
Net Profit |
£ 412,000.00 |
22.61% |
-7.38% |
Equity |
£ 1,822,500.00 |
Year |
Return on Capital Employed |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Profit Before Tax |
(Profit Before Taxes/ Capital Employed)*100 |
£ 631,000.00 |
-21.96% |
-27.19% |
Capital Employed |
-£ 2,873,000.00 |
2020 |
Profit Before Tax |
£ 339,000.00 |
5.23% |
Capital Employed |
£ 6,488,000.00 |
2019 |
Profit Before Tax |
£ 370,000.00 |
5.41% |
-0.19% |
Capital Employed |
£ 6,837,000.00 |
2018 |
Profit Before Tax |
£ 412,000.00 |
6.86% |
-1.45% |
Capital Employed |
£ 6,005,000.00 |
2017 |
Profit Before Tax |
£ 247,200.00 |
6.60% |
0.27% |
£ 3,747,900.00 |
Table 2: Profitability ratios
(Source: Created by learner)
Analysis: The profitability ratios are the tools that measure the ability of the business to generate an earnings compared to its revenue and operating cost over a specific period (Nurwita, and Rodhiah, 2022). It is usually compared with the efficiency ratios. In the case of Smith Construction Limited, the company has been able to earn profits. But the company has to pay a lot to its employees. Including Smith traders Smith and James Blond even though previous people were the founders but they still take a lot of revenue from the company in terms of their compensation which takes a large part of the profit.
Efficiency ratios
Smith Construction Ltd |
Year |
Inventory Turnover Ratio |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Cost of Sales |
(Cost of Sales/ Average Inventory) |
£ 1,695,000.00 |
339.00 |
52.00 |
Average Inventory |
£ 5,000.00 |
2020 |
Cost of Sales |
£ 1,435,000.00 |
287.00 |
Average Inventory |
£ 5,000.00 |
2019 |
Cost of Sales |
£ 1,334,000.00 |
444.67 |
-157.67 |
Average Inventory |
£ 3,000.00 |
2018 |
Cost of Sales |
£ 1,197,000.00 |
399.00 |
45.67 |
Average Inventory |
£ 3,000.00 |
2017 |
Cost of Sales |
£ 239,400.00 |
79.80 |
319.20 |
Average Inventory |
£ 3,000.00 |
Year |
Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Sales |
(Sales/ Fixed Assets) |
£ 4,714,000.00 |
1.06 |
0.20 |
Fixed Assets |
£ 4,461,000.00 |
2020 |
Sales |
£ 3,908,000.00 |
0.86 |
Fixed Assets |
£ 4,570,000.00 |
2019 |
Sales |
£ 3,422,000.00 |
0.77 |
0.08 |
Fixed Assets |
£ 4,429,000.00 |
2018 |
Sales |
£ 3,077,000.00 |
0.68 |
0.10 |
Fixed Assets |
£ 4,545,000.00 |
2017 |
Sales |
£ 615,400.00 |
0.16 |
0.52 |
Fixed Assets |
£ 3,863,250.00 |
Year |
Asset Turnover Ratio |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Sales |
(Sales/ Total Assets) |
£ 4,714,000.00 |
23.57 |
23.18 |
Total Assets |
£ 200,000.00 |
2020 |
Sales |
£ 3,908,000.00 |
0.39 |
Total Assets |
£ 9,992,000.00 |
2019 |
Sales |
£ 3,422,000.00 |
0.37 |
0.02 |
Total Assets |
£ 9,325,000.00 |
2018 |
Sales |
£ 3,077,000.00 |
0.34 |
0.03 |
Total Assets |
£ 9,112,000.00 |
2017 |
Sales |
£ 615,400.00 |
0.15 |
0.19 |
Total Assets |
£ 4,100,400.00 |
Year |
Working Capital Turnover Ratio |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Sales |
(Sales/ Working Capital) |
£ 4,714,000.00 |
-1.64 |
-2.24 |
Working Capital |
-£ 2,873,000.00 |
2020 |
Sales |
£ 3,908,000.00 |
0.60 |
Working Capital |
£ 6,488,000.00 |
2019 |
Sales |
£ 3,422,000.00 |
0.50 |
0.10 |
Working Capital |
£ 6,837,000.00 |
2018 |
Sales |
£ 3,077,000.00 |
0.51 |
-0.01 |
Working Capital |
£ 6,005,000.00 |
2017 |
Sales |
£ 615,400.00 |
0.15 |
0.36 |
Working Capital |
£ 4,076,813.00 |
Year |
Cash Flow Ratio |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Sales |
(Sales/ Cash and Cash Equivalents) |
£ 4,714,000.00 |
5.09 |
0.76 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
£ 927,000.00 |
2020 |
Sales |
£ 3,908,000.00 |
4.32 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
£ 904,000.00 |
2019 |
Sales |
£ 3,422,000.00 |
3.16 |
1.16 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
£ 1,082,000.00 |
2018 |
Sales |
£ 3,077,000.00 |
3.29 |
-0.12 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
£ 936,000.00 |
2017 |
Sales |
£ 615,400.00 |
1.01 |
2.28 |
£ 608,400.00 |
Table 3: Efficiency ratios
(Source: Created by learner)
Analysis: Efficiency ratios are tools that are used for analyzing the ability of a company to employ its sources including the capital and assets that help introduce a regular income.
Solvency ratios
Smith Construction Ltd |
Year |
Debt To Equity Ratio |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Debt |
(Debt /Equity) |
£ 2,823,000.00 |
0.77 |
-0.09 |
Equity |
£ 3,649,000.00 |
2020 |
Debt |
£ 2,908,000.00 |
0.87 |
Equity |
£ 3,353,000.00 |
2019 |
Debt |
£ 3,416,000.00 |
1.04 |
-0.17 |
Equity |
£ 3,281,000.00 |
2018 |
Debt |
£ 3,474,000.00 |
1.43 |
Equity |
£ 2,430,000.00 |
2017 |
Debt |
£ 1,579,500.00 |
1.00 |
0.43 |
Equity |
£ 1,579,500.00 |
Year |
Debt To Total Assets Ratio |
Formula |
Amount |
Ratio |
Growth |
2021 |
Debt |
(Debt /Total Assets) |
£ 2,823,000.00 |
0.27 |
-0.02 |
Total Assets |
£ 10,364,000.00 |
2020 |
Debt |
£ 2,908,000.00 |
0.29 |
Total Assets |
£ 9,992,000.00 |
2019 |
Debt |
£ 3,416,000.00 |
0.37 |
-0.01 |
Total Assets |
£ 9,325,000.00 |
2018 |
Debt |
£ 3,474,000.00 |
0.37 |
Total Assets |
£ 9,112,000.00 |
2017 |
Debt |
£ 2,258,100.00 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
Total Assets |
£ 4,100,400.00 |
Table 4: Solvency ratios
(Source: Created by learner)
Analysis: The total debt to equity ratio for Smith construction limited is in positive terms and it can generate extra sources of income from the asset. It has as a debt-to-total asset ratio of 0.27 and the debt-to-equity ratio is 0.77. It is expected that the company will be able to general a long term regular source of income from the given assets.
Part Two – Internal Controls
Possible areas of misappropriation of company assets
Many cases of forgery in organizations occur around the world. Smith construction is a small organization and due to this many employees have a lot of special access to the companies’ capital and wealth. They have been able to use the wealth to their benefit the assets and acquisitions that have been reported and mentioned in the balance sheet. But what is not reported is not mentioned anywhere. This is also an act of saving the extra expenses and not showing them in the books (Harahap, and Purba, 2022).
Internal controls
Internal control is a process that is conducted by the board of directors and the management in an organization to prevent errors and irregularities in an organization. This also ensures that proper corrective measures have been taken to rectify the errors and irregularities and make the information reliable and accurate on a timely basis.
The components of internal control
Smith Construction has five components in the internal control system. The accountant was working at Smith control construction on all these components.
Control Environment
The first type of component is the control environment with the major role of an organization and influences the control consciousness of the employees. It includes factors such as the integrity, ethical values, and competence of the members. It also deals with the issue such as management, philosophy and operating style of the firm, which helps in the management alliance, the authority and responsibility of different individuals.
Risk Assessment
The Risk Assessment process is the step by which the business evaluates the most critical risk and design control accordingly so that the risk can be handled in the most effective way regularly.
Control Activities
The control activities include the use of information technology and other accounting systems to make sure that appropriate controls are put in place in Smith construction. For example, James Blond must conduct audits of the fixed assets periodically to minimize the risk of data loss (Sujana, et al.2020).
Information and Communication
The component of information and communication is the part where the members of the organization identify and capture the communication in a firm. That will help the members to carry out their responsibilities. James should produce reports that involve operational, financial and compliance-based information that makes it easy to run and control Smith construction effectively. The effective communication must include the vision and values of the engagement survey and how to resolve the issues of the customers (Fajariyah, and Susetyo, 2020).
Monitoring
The component of monitoring is the process that evaluates the quality of the system's performance over a given period (Sepindo, and Chomsatu, 2021). It establishes the ongoing monitoring activities that combine different evaluations in the course of operations. It also reviews the monthly performance of the reports and internal audit functions.
Part Three – Financing a Business
Approaching a bank
Considering banks for financing the businesses is ideal for Smith Construction Ltd. as it will lend money without taking any ownership in equity. The banks offer term loans and other lines of credit which helps the businesses to pay-back the loan amount in installments. The banks usually have an interest rate of around 7% to 8% for small businesses. If a business is profitable then it can easily pay off the amount in regular monthly or quarterly installments.
The banks also offer loan such as equipment financing and real estate financing. The loan is specifically for the purchase of an equipment or a buying a real estate property. Both type of loans are useful for Smith construction as they have to purchase a lot of equipment and they are basically involved in the business of construction. The advantage is that this type of financing is incredibly useful in building relationship with a bank so that they can help in the times of distress. But the biggest disadvantage of financing from a bank is that sometimes they deny to give loans if a company has a poor credit history.
Approaching potential investors
The biggest advantage of financing through a potential investor is that the finance given by them is not a loan. Therefore, the business does not have to repay it back to the investors. The major disadvantage of raising funds from private investors is that they ask for a major chunk of ownership in the company. In exchange for the investment the investors take a considerable amount of stake in the shares of the company and share the profits as well.
Conclusion
The report analyzes the financial position of a company and discusses how internal control is affected by the decisions of the founders of the company. It is also influenced by the employees who are responsible for finance and operations. The report analysis of various ratios helps to estimate the areas of misappropriation of company assets and how they are affects the business of the stakeholders. The report also measures the correct calculation and financial figure that helps in estimating the cost of sales and how different ratios such as efficiency ratios and profitability ratios help in accessing the formulas. Discussion on the different category of ratio is also presented as how they can affect the decision-making process in the organization.
References
- ALAWAQLEH, Q.A., 2021. The effect of internal control on employee performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in Jordan: The role of accounting information systems. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), pp.855-863.
- Budiantoro, H., Artanti, D.V. and Lapae, K., 2022. Analysis Of Liquidity Ratio, Profitability, Solvency, And Activity Before And After Mergers Or Acquisitions In Mergers Or Acquisitions Companies Listed On The Indonesia Stock Exchange (2015-2019 Period). JurnalEkonomi, 11(02), pp.928-939.
- Fajariyah, Z. and Susetyo, A., 2020. Pengaruh Profitability Ratio, Liquidity Ratio, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan dan Struktur Modal sebagaiVariabel Intervening. JurnalIlmiahMahasiswaManajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi (JIMMBA), 2(2), pp.259-270.
- Harahap, N.W. and Purba, R., 2022. An Analysis Liquidity Ratio in Performance Assessing Company Financial at Bank Sumut KCP Syariah 2018-2020. Economist Journal: Scientific Journal of Accountancy, Management and Finance, 2(2), pp.155-162.
- Khairani, R., Syafira, F., Sinaga, M., Gea, R.C. and Sitorus, L., 2021. THE EFFECT OF PROFITABILITY AND LIQUIDITY RATIO ON COMPANY STOCK PRICES IN THE PROPERTY SECTOR. JurnalIlmuManajemen Profitability, 5(2), pp.302-211.
- Kong, K., Liu, R., Zhang, Y. and Chen, Y., 2020, December. Predicting Liquidity Ratio of Mutual Funds via Ensemble Learning. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 5441-5450). IEEE.
- Ludani, W., Pundissing, R. and Pagiu, C., 2022, October. The Analysis Of Liquidity Ratio For Civil Service Cooperative Ao'Gading PGRI Ranting Balusu North Toraja Regency. In Proceeding of The International Conference on Economics and Business (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 86-99).
- Nurwita, N. and Rodhiah, R.A., 2022. LIQUIDITY RATIO AND PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS TO MEASURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN PT. ULTRAJAYA MILK INDUSTRY & TRADING COMPANY TBK. International Journal of Economy, Education and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), pp.110-119.
- Pakurár, M., Haddad, H., Nagy, J., Popp, J. and Oláh, J., 2019. The impact of supply chain integration and internal control on financial performance in the Jordanian banking sector. Sustainability, 11(5), p.1248.
- Sepindo, Y. and Chomsatu, Y., 2021. THE EFFECT OF LIQUIDITY RATIO, PROFITABILITY SOLVENCY STOCK PRICES IN CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING COMPANIES LISTED ON THE INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE PERIOD 2014-2018. JurnalIlmiahAkuntansi dan Manajemen, 17(1), pp.7-12.
- Sujana, E., Kurniawan Saputra, K.A. and Manurung, D.T., 2020. Internal control systems and good village governance to achieve quality village financial reports. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(9).