Brexit on UK Equality & Employment Law Assignment Sample

Introduction Of Equality Law And Employment Law After Brexit

Equality Law And Employment Law after Brexit looks at the post-Brexit landscape of UK Equality Law with regard to EU law changes. It researches what the departure from the EU has meant for UK equality guidelines and Council procedures, revealing insight into the evolving legal framework. The proposal looks into the complex areas of the quality law of the UK.

Background

EU equality law is depending on the UK Parliament. Since the UK joined the EC, EU law has influenced some parts of UK law. Some areas like agriculture, financial services, environment, and trade are affected by the law of the EU. Even the employment and immigration areas have also been influenced by the EU law. The United Kingdom's departure from the European Union has set off huge changes in its legal landscape (Berghs, et al. 2019). This study centers around the complex area of equality law and looks to comprehend how EU law changes have impacted and keep on shaping the UK's approach (Equality Act 2010 (EA)) to dealing with equality and non-discrimination.

Rationale

In the case of Brexit, understanding the importance of EU law changes on UK equality guidelines or regulations is vital significance. This research aims to give important knowledge into the legal dynamics at play, assuring clarity on the present status of matters and directing policymakers, legal practitioners, and researchers in exploring this complicated landscape. By investigating case law, rules, and the Common Freedoms Act, the study aims to solve the complex effect of equality law post-Brexit.

Research aims, questions or hypothesis

This study aims to know the effect of EU law changes on UK equality law and the functioning of Tribunals post-Brexit. It looks to comprehend what the disparity from EU guidelines has meant for equity law in the UK and its suggestions for people looking for change for separation.

Objectives

• To assess the affect of the EU on UK Equality rights.
• To investigate the impact of EU Law Changes on UK guidelines observing Brexit.
• To identify difficulties and opportunities in the implementation of UK balance law since leaving EU guidelines.
• To examine how UK tribunals navigate the post-Brexit legal landscape in discrimination cases.

Questions

• How will the EU affect the equality rights of the UK?
• How have EU law changes impacted the advancement of UK correspondence guidelines observing Brexit?
• What difficulties and valuable opportunities have emerged in the implementation of UK balance law since leaving EU guidelines?
• In discrimination cases, how do UK tribunals navigate the post-Brexit legal landscape?

Hypothesis

It will hypothesize that the departure of the UK from the European Union has prompted critical changes in its uniformity guidelines and the working of Councils. The review guesses that these progressions might have brought about expanded legitimate intricacy, likely gaps in security, and shifting understandings of uniformity regulation. It is normal that case law will assume an urgent part in molding the developing scene of UK equity regulation. The purpose of this study is to better comprehend post-Brexit legal dynamics in terms of equality and human rights and to highlight the complex implications of these changes.

H0: UK tribunals have navigated the post-Brexit legal landscape in discrimination cases.

H1: UK tribunals have no navigation of the post-Brexit legal landscape in discrimination cases.

Literature review

According to Merrett, 2021, The implications of Brexit on equality law and business law definitely stand out and are a common concern since the UK's withdrawal from the European Union. Merrett's research dives into basic parts of business law impacted by Brexit. It explores the intricacies of the decision of law, territorial degree, jurisdiction, and enforcement in international business cases. The review features the post-Brexit difficulties and opportunities concerning the appropriateness of EU regulations, the territorial reach of UK laws, and the advancing jurisdictional landscape (Merrett, 2021). it offers bits of knowledge into the consequences of Brexit on the freedoms of workers and the enforcement of business standards. the Equality Act 2010 comes into the center as researchers and legitimate practitioners wrestle with reconciling UK business law with its European partners in this new era. Merrett's work is vital to understanding the developing landscape of equality and business law in the UK post-Brexit, giving a foundational reference highlight ensuing discussions and research in this basic legitimate region.

Get Extra 10% OFF on your WhatsApp order!

use my discount

According to the author Kamasak, et al. (2019), the diverse parts of discrimination, highlight its commonness, manifestations, and implications within the UK workforce. They offer an investigation of the difficulties faced by ethnic minorities and transients, emphasizing the significance of managing variety and promoting inclusion within organizational settings (Kamasak, et al. 2019). The part adds to the more extensive talk on race and nationality in the workplace, providing significant insights and viewpoints from the UK setting. By exploring the intricacies of discrimination and offering expected strategies for addressing these issues, this literature fills in as a huge determination of professionals, and policymakers worried about promoting variety, value, and inclusion in the workplace across the European Union.

According to the author O'Cinneide (2018), one pivotal aspect of this discourse involves the potential impact of Brexit on the incorporation of EU equality directives into UK law. The Equality Act 2010 fills in as a cornerstone of UK equality legislation, amalgamating a multitude of EU directives. Scholars have contemplated whether Brexit might lead to the revision or replacement of this legislation, impacting various facets of anti-discrimination law (O'Cinneide, 2018). The withdrawal from the EU has incited scrutiny representing things to come relationship between UK courts and European human rights institutions. The Human Rights Act 1998, while not directly tied to Brexit, remains central to discussions regarding the preservation of human rights standards in the UK, as it incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic law.

Methodology

In this part, the researcher will propose a methodology for exploring the effect of EU law Changes on UK equality law The exploration's aim will be to thoroughly look at the change of UK equity law as a result of Brexit, including the ramifications for council procedures, taking into account case regulation, the Human Rights Act 1998, and applicable EU law.

Research Approach

The research approach that has been taken here is the inductive approach of research. The study will take on a secondary approach, enveloping qualitative research methods to guarantee an understanding and comprehension of the topic. This approach is fundamental given the intricacy and diverse nature of legal and administrative changes. The research will begin with a survey of regulative changes and key court decisions connected with UK equity regulation post-Brexit.

Research Philosophy

The philosophy for this research that has been considered here is interpretivism research philosophy. This work area-based research will give a secondary comprehension of the legitimate scene and distinguish key regions for additional investigation.

This study will include an inside and out assessment of UK equity regulation and guidelines presented or altered post-Brexit. It will survey the arrangement with past EU regulations, pinpointing areas of coherence and difference.

Method of data collection

The collection of secondary data is performed with the help of online databases. From the internet secondary data should have to collect and analysis will be done. For collecting the data, the researcher will collect through books, internet, journals etc.

Data Analysis

Qualitative data analysis method will be followed in the research. For analysis the data, the researcher need to analysis some relevant grapes and images. And the researcher will include some real life case study examples.

Ethics

Inside this research, a few method considerations emerge because of its inclination. It is pivotal to address these considerations proactively to guarantee the best expectations of method conduct through the review. The essential method considerations spin around information protection and informed consent. Considering that this research might include gathering information from people, steps will be taken to shield their personal information and guarantee their consent is completely informed (Favell, 2020). This incorporates getting clear and deliberate consent from all research members and guaranteeing that information is anonymized and stored safely.

The research will comply with confidentiality and information protection standards, observing the rules set out in the UK Equality Law and the Human Rights Act 1998. Any expected dangers to members will be painstakingly evaluated, and suitable measures will be carried out to moderate these dangers (Busby and Weldon-Johns, 2019). The research group will likewise stay focused on straightforwardness and transparency, ensuring that members know about the review's purpose and potential results.

Dissemination and impact

Sharing the findings of this research is vital to its effect and importance. The dissemination plan for this study will utilize a multi-layered approach to deal with a guarantee that the research contacts a wide crowd, including policymakers, legitimate practitioners, researchers, and the overall population. The research findings will be spread through academic channels, including peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant conferences and classes. These academic platforms will work with commitment from scholars and specialists in the field, encouraging discussions and debates on the implications of EU law changes on UK equality regulations (Sánchez-Monedero, et al. 2020). The research results will be imparted to policymakers and government people responsible for equality regulations in the UK. This immediate commitment will give important experiences into potential arrangement changes and administrative changes that might be fundamental.

A non-technical summary of the research findings will be ready for more extensive public consumption. This will be appropriated through available channels like online platforms, virtual entertainment, and public discourses, guaranteeing that the more extensive local area is informed about the implications of post-Brexit EU law changes on equality. The research aims to contribute to informed decision-production, legal discourse, and public awareness, eventually trying to upgrade the comprehension and protection of equality freedoms in the UK post-Brexit.

Timescale

Figure 1: Timescale

(Source: Self-Created in MS Project)

Referencing

• Berghs, M., Atkin, K., Hatton, C. and Thomas, C., 2019. Do disabled people need a stronger social model: a social model of human rights? Disability & Society, 34(7-8), pp.1034-1039.
• Busby, N. and Weldon-Johns, M., 2019. Fathers as carers in UK law and policy: Dominant ideologies and lived experience. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 41(3), pp.280-301.
• Fahy, N., Hervey, T., Greer, S., Jarman, H., Stuckler, D., Galsworthy, M. and McKee, M., 2019. How will Brexit affect health services in the UK? An updated evaluation. The Lancet, 393(10174), pp.949-958.
• Favell, A., 2020. Crossing the Race Line:“No Polish, No Blacks, No Dogs” in Brexit Britain? or, the Great British Brexit Swindle. In Europe's Malaise: The Long View (pp. 103-130). Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Kamasak, R., Özbilgin, M.F., Yavuz, M. and Akalin, C., 2019. Race discrimination at work in the United Kingdom. In Race discrimination and management of ethnic diversity and migration at work: European countries' perspectives (pp. 107-127). Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Merrett, L., 2021. International Employment Cases Post-Brexit: Choice of Law, Territorial Scope, Jurisdiction and Enforcement. Industrial Law Journal, 50(3), pp.343-374.
• O'Cinneide, C., 2018. Brexit and human rights.
• Özbilgin, M., Erbil, C. and Dipalma, A., 2023. Migrant diversity: Introducing the migrant diversity category to diversity management. Research handbook on migration and employment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Sánchez-Monedero, J., Dencik, L. and Edwards, L., 2020, January. What does it mean to'solve'the problem of discrimination in hiring? Social, technical and legal perspectives from the UK on automated hiring systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 458-468).
• Solanke, I., 2020. The Impact of Brexit on Black Women, Children and Citizenship. J. Common Mkt. Stud., 58, p.147.
• Solomon, R., 2021. Rights and the post-Brexit agenda: rights protection and institutional inadequacy in the United Kingdom. Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies, 13(1).
• Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B. and Russell, C., 2021. Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 41, p.105567.