Equality, Diversity and Fair Treatment Assignment Sample

Equality, Diversity and Fair Treatment Assignment

LO1

P1

Psychological prejudice, bias, and discrimination in the NHS may be linked back to an assortment of the past, community, and behavioural factors.

A person's brain's innate inclination to categorise and to form rapid judgments with regard to very little data might be traced to the beginnings of unconscious bias. Often, societal preconceptions and cultural conventions generate and maintain these prejudices. Institutional inequities and disparities in access to medical care and service have also led to the creation of prejudices in the setting of the NHS. Prejudice and discrimination stem from firmly established cultural beliefs and connections of power. In the instance of the NHS, medical staff might have prejudices or stereotypes towards different patient populations that stem from characteristics that include ethnic origin, racial origin, or income level (FRS, 2018). Prejudices like these can have an impact on the standard of treatment delivered and lead to disparities in health status between groups. In addition, biased effects may be unintentionally maintained through institutionalised practises including institutions inside the NHS. Inadequate resource allocation, recruiting practises, and processes for making choices, for instance might result in uneven mistreatment and restricted opportunities for particular communities. Recognising and dealing with the causes of unintentional bias, prejudice, and discrimination necessitates an integrated strategy (House, 2018). To eliminate prejudice, the NHS must participate in continuing inclusiveness and diversity training, develop multicultural skills, and come up with clear guidelines and processes.

New Assignment Help provides exceptional assignment writing help in the UK, ensuring students receive top-quality, customized solutions for their academic needs. Our professional writers are adept at handling various subjects, delivering assignments that meet your specific requirements. To showcase our expertise, we offer free samples of our work, allowing you to see the quality of our writing. With New Assignment Help, you can rest assured that your assignments are in capable hands.

P2

Recognising unconscious bias, prejudice, and discriminatory behaviour in the public sector is critical, especially in relation to the setting of the National Health Service (NHS) and the safeguarded feature of disabilities. To begin, the NHS strives to offer equal and readily available treatment to every one of people, no matter their handicap. Unconscious biases and prejudices, on the other hand, might inadvertently impair the level of care and assistance delivered. Recognising and eliminating these prejudices is critical to ensuring that people who are disabled get equal privilege and equitable opportunities for medical services (Atewologun, 2018). Furthermore, recognising unconscious bias and prejudice aids in the development of a more diverse and inviting workplace within the healthcare system of NHS. By recognising as well as correcting prejudices, health care providers may encourage favourable attitudes regarding individuals who possess disabilities, cultivating confidence as well as successful interaction. The latter, which consequently, improves how patients feel and results. Tackling prejudice and discrimination is also essential for building an inclusive and multicultural staff in the NHS (Blair, 2011). The association is equipped for drawing in and holding a wide range of people by grasping and tirelessly wiping out bias. It likewise ensures that laborers who are handicapped have equivalent opportunities for progression, adding to a naturally even-handed and inviting climate at work (Marcelin, 2019).

M1

Unconscious bias, prejudice, and discrimination might bring about serious ramifications for the working of the public authority, especially in the setting of the National Health Service (NHS) and those with a safeguarded element of handicaps. For starters, these prejudices can result in inequities regarding medical accessibility and affordability for people having impairments. Biases can influence the way medical professionals understand and react to the requirements of handicapped individuals, which leads to uneven treatment and ultimately jeopardising the well-being of patients (Taghizadeh, 2022). This might have a detrimental impact on physical wellness and exacerbate disparities in health. In addition, psychological biases and discrimination might have an impact on NHS processes for making choices. Biases, for instance could influence the distribution of resources, resulting in reduced funding as well as assistance for disability-related programmes. Racism in employment and advancement practises can lead to the low representation of handicapped people in the NHS employees, restricting variety and viewpoints. The effect spreads to the encounters of NHS staff with impairments, who might encounter discrimination and uneven professional growth possibilities. This can have a detrimental impact on employee mood, satisfaction with work, and total employee diversity (Storm, 2023).

D1

Unconscious bias, prejudice, and discrimination have negative consequences for persons in the public field, particularly the National Health Service (NHS) and people with a protected feature of disabilities. Survivors might suffer from a lack of self-worth, emotional anguish, and limited possessions and possibilities. Victims might encounter consequences in court, harm to their credibility, and disrupted professional connections. In reaction, public-sector organisations such as the NHS have enacted legislation to counteract these challenges. The NHS has created guidelines and instructional programmes to enhance understanding, encourage inclusion, and guarantee that people who have limitations receive equitable care.

LO2

P3

In the setting of the designated feature of impairment, the following law is aimed at promoting fairness, diversity, equality, and fair behaviour in government organisations, particularly the National Health Service (NHS):

The Equality Act of 2010: The legislation forbids disability-based prejudice, intimidation, and victimisation, while also assuring full equality for goods and job opportunities.

The Health and Social Care statute of 2012: This statute makes NHS organisations responsible for reducing inequality in health care, encouraging participation from patients, and ensuring equal treatment as well as accessibility to medical care for people with impairments.

The Public Sector Equality Duty: The Public Sector Equality Duty mandates agencies in the public sector, particularly the National Health Service, to remove prejudice, enhance equality, and develop good relations among different categories, especially handicapped people (McKearney, 2019).

P4

Advisory assistance is critical in fostering diversity, equality, and equal opportunities in public sector job opportunities like the National Health Service (NHS) and in connection with the protected feature of impairment. These organisations assist the staff and business owners in comprehending and carrying out inclusion practises by providing advice, assistance, and knowledge. They provide guidance on creating policies, instruction, and ensuring that people follow the rights of those with disabilities laws. Advisory services help to raise understanding, challenge prejudices, and develop a welcoming work atmosphere throughout the NHS, guaranteeing that people who have disabilities receive treatment appropriately and have equal job possibilities (OECD, 2019).

M2

Equal treatment, diversity, as well as equitable conduct regulation in public agencies, including the National Health Service (NHS), having a substantial influence on customers as well as staff members. Workers benefit from the Act because it provides legal safeguards against unfair treatment, fosters equitable chances for professional advancement, and encourages beneficial places of employment. According to one example study, the NHS saw an increase in worker happiness, participation, and attrition after enacting equality laws. From the standpoint of the consumer, regulation guarantees that people with disabilities have the same access to medical treatment, resulting in enhanced client experiences & results. A case investigation, for instance, found that accessible enhancements in NHS hospitals improved the overall experience of impaired people, contributing to increased contentment and access to medical care (Djebarni, 2011).

LO3

P5

To fabricate a hierarchical system in the setting of the NHS including the shielded component of impediment, material regulations, for example, the Equality Act 2010, should be consolidated. This Act lays out the lawful establishment to support fairness and uniformity without separation. Work associations assume a significant part in safeguarding the necessities of laborers and lobbying for equivalent open door and reasonableness. They collaborate with NHS management to have an impact on policy creation, guaranteeing that staff members having disabilities' rights and preferences are taken into account. Trade unions help with the development of inclusive strategies that tackle disability-related concerns and foster equality inside the NHS via cooperation and engagement (Korobchenko, 2022).

M3

Organisational policies have a considerable influence on public sector employment, particularly the National Health Service (NHS) and the protected feature of disability. Organisational strategies that address disability rights and inclusion have a number of positive implications on employment in the NHS. For starters, these rules promote a diverse and inclusive workforce by ensuring equitable opportunity for people with disabilities (Nasi, 2021). The NHS can recruit and keep brilliant individuals by removing obstacles and making appropriate adjustments, resulting in a competent and diverse staff. Furthermore, these rules foster a welcoming and inclusive workplace for employees with disabilities. Employee well-being, job happiness, and productivity are improved by accessible facilities, flexible working arrangements, and acceptable adaptations. As a result, worker morale, retention rates, and overall organisational performance improve. Organisational policies are very important in preventing discrimination and promoting fair treatment. The NHS can successfully handle incidents of prejudice by developing clear rules and processes, such as grievance and complaint channels. This protects employees with impairments and guarantees that their rights are honoured (Bibi, 2021). Furthermore, these principles contribute to the NHS's reputation as a welcoming and socially responsible organisation. The NHS can increase public trust, improve its image as an employer, and recruit a wide pool of talent by aggressively promoting equality and diversity (JAIN, 2023).

LO4

P6

Equality, diversity, and fair treatment assist the operation of public services in a variety of ways, including the National Health Service (NHS) and the protected feature of disability.

For starters, fostering equality and diversity in the NHS improves healthcare quality. A diverse workforce contributes a wide range of viewpoints, experiences, and information, resulting in better decision-making and inventive solutions. The NHS may better comprehend and cater to the unique needs of people living with disabilities by accepting multiple points of view, and guaranteeing medical facilities are readily available, suitable, and person-centred. Furthermore, equitable treatment and opportunity promote a pleasant work atmosphere inside the NHS. Employees' work happiness, engagement, and productivity improve when they feel appreciated, respected, and treated fairly. This, in turn, improves the organization's overall performance, resulting in improved patient outcomes and experiences. Furthermore, a varied spectrum of competent individuals is attracted and retained by an inclusive NHS. The NHS can tap into a pool of competent employees who bring unique perspectives and experience by supporting equal opportunities for people with disabilities. This improves the organization's capacity to fulfil a varied population's complicated and changing healthcare demands (Sumra, 2019).

M4

For various reasons, the importance of fairness, inclusion, and fair behaviour in work environments, especially within the National Health Service (NHS) and in connection to the safeguarded feature of impairment, cannot be overstated. For starters, encouraging equality, diversity, and fair treatment promotes a more welcoming and diversified workplace within the NHS. The NHS can tap into a broader pool of talent and recruit personnel with various viewpoints, talents, and experiences by appreciating and accepting diversity, including disability. This improves imaginative thinking, problem-solving, and innovation, resulting in better medical results for every individual. In addition, equity as well as equitable treatment guarantee that all staff in the NHS, regardless of handicap, have equal opportunity for career growth and advancement in their careers. This contributes to a trained and motivated workforce by increasing employee happiness, engagement, and retention. From the standpoint of patients, equality, diversity, and fair treatment are critical in the NHS. People who are disabled ought to enjoy comparable access to medical attention, appropriate accommodations, and individualised assistance. The NHS can guarantee that patients with disabilities receive equitable treatment by supporting inclusive practises, resulting to improved experiences for patients, happiness, and medical outcomes (Niroula, 2017).

D2

Legislation, regulations, and working practises all have an influence on the delivery of fair, equitable, and varied public services. The combination of organisational policy, regulation, and UNISON's role in analysing workplace equality and diversity may considerably benefit public sector employees.
Legislation, such as the Equality Act of 2010, establishes the legal basis for encouraging equality, diversity, and equitable treatment. It creates protected characteristics and bans discrimination, protecting public servants from unjust treatment based on variables such as age, handicap, gender, ethnicity, and others. Organisational policies are critical in putting laws into action. Organisations may establish a supportive work environment where all workers are treated fairly and given equal opportunity for development and progress by creating inclusive policies that address equality and diversity. These policies create rules for recruiting, promotion, and training, assisting in the elimination of any biases and hurdles. As a trade union, UNISON's responsibility in analysing equality and diversity in the workplace is critical. UNISON works with employers to negotiate and influence policies that are in line with statutory standards and meet the demands of public sector employees. UNISON also helps employees by educating them about their rights and pushing for fair treatment and equal chances (Blair, 2011).

Struggling with Healthcare Assignment? Let New Assignment Help guide you to success! We offer top-tier healthcare assignment help to ensure you excel in your studies. Don’t let tight deadlines and complex theories hold you back. Get the expert support you need to achieve academic excellence. Contact New Assignment Help today!

References

Atewologun, D., 2018. Unconscious bias training: An assessment of the evidence for effectiveness, s.l.: Equality and Human Rights Commission.

Bibi, M., 2021. Does Organizational Politics in Public Sector Mediates the Impact of Recruitment and Selection on Employee Performance, s.l.: Bahria University Karachi Campus.

Blair, I. V., 2011. Unconscious (Implicit) Bias and Health Disparities: Where Do We Go from Here?. Perm J., 15(2), p. 71–78.

Djebarni, R., 2011. Equality and Diversity Management: An Investigation into the Business Case of Equality and Diversity Practice in SMEs. International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, 10(5), pp. 145-168.

FRS, F. D. F. F., 2018. Unconscious bias, s.l.: The Royal Society .

House, A., 2018. Processes of prejudice:Theory, evidence and intervention, s.l.: University of Kent.

JAIN, R., 2023. Preferential Employment Policies and Firm Performance: Evidence from Indian Public Sector Enterprises, s.l.: Wiley Online Library .

Korobchenko, V. V., 2022. Legislative Provisions Underlying Trade Unions' Right to Define Their Organizational Structure. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SCIENCE EDUCATION, 11(10), pp. 3925-3936.

Marcelin, J. R., 2019. The Impact of Unconscious Bias in Healthcare: How to Recognize and Mitigate It. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 220.

McKearney, A., 2019. Equality and diversity in the public services: moving forward on lesbian, gay and bisexual equality?. Human Resource Management Journal.

Nasi, G., 2021. Public Personnel Policies: Impact on Government Performance. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice, 13(1), pp. 5-10.

Niroula, A., 2017. Managing diversity and equality in the workplace.. Asian Institute of Technology.

OECD, 2019. Fostering Diversity in the Public Service, s.l.: Public Employment and Management Working Party.

Storm, K. I. L., 2023. Unconscious bias in the HRM literature: Towards a critical-reflexive approach. Human Resource Management Review, 33(3).

Sumra, K., 2019. Social Equity in Public Administration: Fairness, Justice and Equity, tools for social change. Pakistan Administrative Review.

Taghizadeh, J. L., 2022. The effects of implicit biases on real-life client discrimination among public officials. Research and Politics, pp. 1-8.